According to Newton's Second Law of Motion :
The Force acting on an Object is equal to Product of Mass of the Object and Acceleration produced due to the Force.
Force acting = Mass of the Object × Acceleration
Given : Force = 50 newton and Mass of the Object = 10 kg
Substituting the respective values in the Formula, we get :
50 N = 10 kg × Acceleration
Acceleration of the Object = 5 m/s²
Answer:
n = 5 approx
Explanation:
If v be the velocity before the contact with the ground and v₁ be the velocity of bouncing back
= e ( coefficient of restitution ) = 
and
h₁ is height up-to which the ball bounces back after first bounce.
From the two equations we can write that
So on
= .00396
Taking log on both sides
- n / 2 = log .00396
n / 2 = 2.4
n = 5 approx
Answer:
we assume that it starts with a velocity of 10m/s. At 2m height above ground level, its velocity decreases at 3m above ground level
for its way down the velocity at 3m on its way down is more than its velocity at 2m on its way down.
Explanation:
A student throws a small rock straight upwards. The rock rises to its highest point and then falls back down. How does the speed of the rock at 2m on the way down compare with its speed at 2m on the way up?
It decreases in speed on its way down and increases in speed on its way down.
it decreases in speed on its way up because the the vertical motion is against the earths gravitational pull on an object to the earth's center
.It increases in speed on his way down because its under the influence of gravity
from newton's equation of motion we can check by
using V^2=u^2+2as
we assume that it starts with a velocity of 10m/s. At 2m height above ground level, its velocity decreases at 3m above ground level
for its way down the velocity at 3m on its way down is more than its velocity at 2m on its way down.
The question is somewhat ambiguous.
-- It's hard to tell whether it's asking about '3 cubic meters'
or (3m)³ which is actually 27 cubic meters.
-- It's hard to tell whether it's asking about '100 cubic feet'
or (100 ft)³ which is actually 1 million cubic feet.
I'm going to make an assumption, and then proceed to
answer the question that I have invented.
I'm going to assume that the question is referring to
'three cubic meters' and 'one hundred cubic feet' .
OK. We'll obviously need to convert some units here.
I've decided to convert the meters into feet.
For 1 meter, I always use 3.28084 feet.
Then (1 meter)³ = 1 cubic meter = (3.28084 ft)³ = 35.31 cubic feet.
So 3 cubic meters = (3 x 35.31 cubic feet) = 105.9 cubic feet.
That's more volume than 100 cubic feet.
