Answer:
248.756 mV
49.7265 µA
Explanation:
The Thevenin equivalent source at one terminal of the bridge is ...
voltage: (100 V)(1000/(1000 +1000) = 50 V
impedance: 1000 || 1000 = (1000)(1000)/(1000 +1000) = 500 Ω
The Thevenin equivalent source at the other terminal of the bridge is ...
voltage = (100 V)(1010/(1000 +1010) = 100(101/201) ≈ 50 50/201 V
impedance: 1000 || 1010 = (1000)(1010)/(1000 +1010) = 502 98/201 Ω
__
The open-circuit voltage is the difference between these terminal voltages:
(50 50/201) -(50) = 50/201 V ≈ 0.248756 V . . . . open-circuit voltage
__
The current that would flow is given by the open-circuit voltage divided by the sum of the source resistance and the load resistance:
(50/201 V)/(500 +502 98/201 +4000) = 1/20110 A ≈ 49.7265 µA
Answer:
The solution for this question is attached below:
Answer:
An isolation transformer whose main purpose is to reduce voltage spikes will have a turns ratio of 1 to 1.
This is due to the windings input and output having the same waveform and amplitude.
Answer: yes
Explanation: People post bad things that i think should get taken down i was on an app the other day and people were posting bad things
Answer:
The flow of a real fluid has <u>more</u> complexity as compared to an ideal fluid owing to the phenomena caused by existence of <u>viscosity</u>
Explanation:
For a ideal fluid we know that there is no viscosity of the fluid hence the boundary condition need's not to be satisfied and the flow occur's without any head loss due to viscous nature of the fluid. The friction of the pipe has no effect on the flow of an ideal fluid. But for a real fluid the viscosity of the fluid has a non zero value, the viscosity causes boundary layer effects, causes head loss and also frictional losses due to pipe friction hugely make the analysis of the flow complex. The losses in the energy of the flow becomes complex to calculate as frictional losses depend on the roughness of the pipe and Reynolds number of the flow thus increasing the complexity of the analysis of flow.
