In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Kids like fun things, and school is not fun , so if kids got to go to school on a zipline, attendance would be through the roof!
Answer:
4.285 L of water must be added.
Explanation:
Hello there!
In this case, for this dilution-like problems, we need to figure out the final volume of the resulting solution so that we would be able to obtain the correct volume of diluent (water) to be added. In such a way, we can obtain the final volume, V2, as shown below:

Thus, by plugging in the initial molarity, initial volume and final molarity (0.587 M) we obtain:

It means we need to add:

Of diluent water.
Regards!
Answer:
(i) Bohr; (ii) de Broglie; (iii) Heisenberg (v) Schrödinger
Explanation:
(i) Niels Bohr — 1913 — proposed that electrons travel in fixed orbits with <em>quantized energy levels</em> and that they jump from one energy level to another by absorbing or emitting quanta of light.
(ii) <em>Louis de Broglie</em> — 1924 — proposed the wave nature of electrons and suggested that all matter behaves as both waves and particles (<em>wave-particle duality</em>).
(iii) Werner Heisenberg — 1927 — formulated quantum mechanics in terms of matrices and proposed his famous <em>uncertainty principle</em>.
(v) Erwin Schrödinger — 1926 — applied wave mechanics to the electron in a hydrogen atom, showing that electrons exist in <em>orbitals </em>rather that orbits.
(iv) <em>Ernest Rutherford</em> — 1911 — proposed that atoms have most of their mass in a central nucleus (<em>nuclear atom</em>). Quantum mechanics had not yet been invented.
Answer:
30.0 mol CO₂
Explanation:
C₃H₈ + 5O₂ → 3CO₂ + 4H₂O
To answer this problem we need to convert moles of C₃H₈ into moles of CO₂: We'll do that by using the <u>stoichiometric coefficients</u>, using a conversion factor that has C₃H₈ moles in the denominator and CO₂ moles in the numerator:
10.0 mol C₃H₈ *
= 30.0 mol CO₂