The statement “Only the “Conclusion” section discusses whether the original hypothesis was supported, and both sections suggest further research”, best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Answer: Option 4
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In research, we do experiments and derive the results. Then, those results were analyzed by us. In this analysis part, we compare our results with the related results published elsewhere. Also, we correlate the similarities and point out the differences between our analysis and other reported results.
In conclusion part, we have to check hypothesis or it supported. And, we summarise our analysis and figure out the further research need to be done on that to improvise our research. So, the final statement is the correct option which best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Bull sharks have the unique ability of keeping salt in their bodies even freshwater
Answer:
b. 0,99atm
c. Answer is in the explanation
d. Answer is in the explanation
Explanation:
b. Using Gay-Lussac's law:
P₁T₂ = P₂T₁
P₁: 0,70 atm; T₂: 425K; P₂: ??; T₁: 299K
0,70atm×425K / 299K = <em>0,99 atm</em>
c. Using kinetic molecular theory, the increasing of temperature increases the kinetic energy of gas particles and if kinetic energy increases, the pressure increases. That means the increasing of temperature increases the pressure in the system.
d. Now, the increases in kinetic energy of gases increase the collisions betwen particles. As these intermolecular forces that are not taken into account in ideal gas law, the observed pressure will be different to the pressure predicted by ideal gas law.
I hope it helps!
