Answer:
News Article= intends to inform readers
provides an unbiased point of view
reports on current events.
Editorial= intends to persuade readers
provides a biased point of view
uses evidence to support a claim
Explanation:
Make me Brainliest Answer =)
Answer:
2 secs; 65 feet
Explanation:
The function guiding the water bottle is given as:
f(x) = -16t² + 64t + 1
The bottle will reach maximum height when velocity, df/dt (velocity is the first derivative of distance) = 0.
Therefore:
df/dt = 0 = -32t + 64
=> 32t = 64
t = 64/32 = 2 seconds
This is the time it will take to reach the maximum height.
To find this height, we insert t = 2 into the function f(x):
f = -16(2)² + 64(2) + 1
f = -(16 * 4) + 128 + 1
f = -64 + 128 + 1
f = 65 ft
Its maximum height is 65 ft.
At r = 0.766 R the magnetic field intensity will be half of its value at the center of the current carrying loop.
We have a circular loop of radius ' r ' carrying current ' i '.
We have to find at what distance along the axis of the loop is the magnetic field one-half its value at the center of the loop.
<h3>What is the formula to calculate the
Magnetic field intensity due to a current carrying circular loop at a point on its axis?</h3>
The formula to calculate the magnetic field intensity due to a current carrying ( i ) circular loop of radius ' R ' at a distance ' x ' on its axis is given by -

Now, for magnetic field intensity at the center of the loop can calculated by putting x = 0 in the above equation. On solving, we get -

Let us assume that the distance at which the magnetic field intensity is one-half its value at the center of the loop be ' r '. Then -




r = 0.766R
Hence, at r = 0.766 R - the magnetic field intensity will be half of its value at the center of the current carrying loop.
To solve more questions on magnetic field intensity, visit the link below-
brainly.com/question/15553675
#SPJ4
It’s a I hope this helps you out
Answer:
c, its axis is tilted
maybe
As it works its way around the sun, its tilted axis exposes different parts of earth.
C would be it because the roation of Earth on its axis doesn't have anything to do with the exposer of the revolution on its axis