1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
3 years ago
15

A 6 kg block initially at rest is pulled to East along a horizontal, frictionless surface by a constant horizontal force of 12 N

. Find the speed of the block after it has moved 3m.
Physics
1 answer:
enot [183]3 years ago
4 0

Answers:

a) 3.46 m/s

b) 2 m/s^{2}

Explanation:

The complete question is written below:

A 6 kg block initially at rest is pulled to East along a horizontal, frictionless surface by a constant horizontal force of 12 N.

a) Find the speed of the block (using work-kinetic energy theorem) after it has moved 3.0 m.

b) Find the acceleration of the block using Newton.

<h3>a) Speed of the block after it has moved 3m</h3>

Let's begin by explaining the following:

The Work W done by a Force F refers to the release of potential energy from a body that is moved by the application of that force to overcome a resistance along a path.  In addition, W is a scalar quantity, and its unit in the International System of Units is the Joule (like energy).

Now, when the applied force is constant and the direction of the force and the direction of motion are parallel, the equation to calculate it is:  

W=F.d (1)

Where:

F= 12 N is the force exerted to pull the block to the East

d= 3 m is the distance the block has been moved

W=(12 N)(3 m) (2)

W=36 Nm= 36 J (3)

On the other hand, energy is the ability of matter to produce work in the form of movement, light, heat, among others. In this sense, according to the  <u>Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem</u> we have:

W=\Delta K=K_{f}-K_{o} (4)

Where:

\Delta K is the variation in kinetic energy K which is equal to:

K=\frac{1}{2}mV^{2} (5)

Where:

m=6kg is the mass of the block

V is the velocity

Hence, the <u>Work-Kinetic Energy Theorem </u> is written as follows:

W=\frac{1}{2}mV_{f}^{2} - \frac{1}{2}mV_{o}^{2} (6)

Where the initial velocity is zero (V_{o}=0 m/s) since we are told the block is initially at rest:

W=\frac{1}{2}mV_{f}^{2} (7)

So, we have to find the final velocity V_{f}, substituting (3) in (7):

36 J=\frac{1}{2}6 kg V_{f}^{2} (8)

V_{f}=3.46 m/s (9) This is the speed of the block after it has moved 3m

<h3>b) Acceleration of the block</h3>

According to <u>Newton's second law of motion, </u>which relates the force F with the mass m and the acceleration a of an object, we have:

F=m.a (10)

On the other hand, acceleration is the variation of velocity \Delta Vin time \Delta t:

a=\frac{\Delta V}{\Delta t} (11)

Then, equation (10) is rewritten as:

F=m \frac{\Delta V}{\Delta t} (12)

Isolating \Delta t:

\Delta t=\frac{m \Delta V}{F} (13)

Since \Delta V=V_{f}-V_{o} and V_{o}=0, we have:

\Delta V=V_{f}=3.46 m/s

\Delta t=\frac{(6 kg) (3.46 m/s)}{12 N} (14)

\Delta t=1.73 s (15)

Substituting (15) in (11):

a=\frac{3.46 m/s}{1.73 s} (16)

Finally:

a=1.99 m/s^{2} \approx 2 m/s^{2} This is the acceleration

You might be interested in
Why do not we observe space quantization for spinning top?
Sophie [7]
Spinning top follow the classical mechanics so no space quantization is observed.
5 0
3 years ago
How do you think scientists figure out what they think the population will be in 2050?
laila [671]
They would most likely use statistics on the increase/decrease in population from previous decades and centuries. In addition to these statistics, they could use the birth and death rate and ultimately predict the increase within these next 30 years. They must also take climate change and other environmental factors into consideration when formulating such a bold prediction.
4 0
3 years ago
A certain digital camera having a lens with focal length 7.50 cmcm focuses on an object 1.70 mm tall that is 4.70 mm from the le
Crank

Answer:

a. 7.62cm

b. Real and inverted

c. 2.76 cm

d. 3450

Explanation:

We proceed as follows;

a. the lens equation that relates the object distance to the image distance with the focal length is given as follows;

1/f = 1/p + 1/q

making q the subject of the formula;

q = pf/p-f

From the question;

p = 4.70m

f = 7.5cm = 0.075m

Substituting these, we have ;

q = (4.7)(0.075)/(4.7-0.075) = 0.3525/4.625 = 0.0762 = 7.62 cm

b. The image is real and inverted since the image distance is positive

c. We want to calculate how tall the image is

Mathematically;

h1 = (q/p)h0

h1 = (7.62/4.70)* 1.7

h1 = 2.76 cm

d. We want to calculate the number of pixels that fit into this image

Mathematically:

n = h1/8 micro meter

n = 2.76cm/8 micro meter = 2.76 * 10^-2/8 * 10^-6 = 3450

3 0
3 years ago
Kim throws a beach ball up in the air. It reaches its maximum height 0.50s later. We can ignore air resistance. What was the bea
notka56 [123]

Answer:

The beach ball's velocity at the moment it was tossed into the air is <u>4.9 m/s.</u>

Explanation:

Given:

Time taken by the ball to reach maximum height is, t=0.50\ s

We know that, velocity of an object at the highest point is always zero. So, final velocity of the ball is, v=0\ m/s

Also, acceleration acting on the ball is always due to gravity. So, acceleration of the ball is, a=g=-9.8\ m/s^2

The negative sign is used as acceleration is a vector and it acts in the downward direction.

Now, we have the equation of motion relating initial velocity, final velocity, acceleration and time given as:

v=u+at

Where, 'u' is the initial velocity.

Plug in the given values and solve for 'u'. This gives,

0=u-9.8(0.5)\\u=9.8\times 0.5\\u=4.9\ m/s

Therefore, the beach ball's velocity at the moment it was tossed into the air is 4.9 m/s

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When making maps of the large-scale universe, astronomers estimate distances to the vast majority of galaxies by using:
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

<em>The comoving distance and the proper distance scale</em>

<em></em>

Explanation:

The comoving distance scale removes the effects of the expansion of the universe, which leaves us with a distance that does not change in time due to the expansion of space (since space is constantly expanding). The comoving distance and proper distance are defined to be equal at the present time; therefore, the ratio of proper distance to comoving distance now is 1. The scale factor is sometimes not equal to 1. The distance between masses in the universe may change due to other, local factors like the motion of a galaxy within a cluster.  Finally, we note that the expansion of the Universe results in the proper distance changing, but the comoving distance is unchanged by an expanding universe.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Samantha is viewing a real image formed by a lens of a diamond ring. Which must be true about the image?
    15·2 answers
  • Which states the purpose of an experiment?
    7·2 answers
  • According to the conservation of momentum, if a small football player collides with a much larger football player, which of the
    15·1 answer
  • The addition of heat Q causes a metal object to increase in temperature from 4°C to 6°C . What is the amount of heat necessary t
    9·2 answers
  • Xavier is roller skating at 14 km/h and tosses a set of keys forward on the ground at 8 km/h. The speed of the keys relative to
    13·1 answer
  • Calculate the volume of this regular solid.
    12·2 answers
  • Describing the Changes in the Ator Based on the article "Will the real atomic model please stand up?,"describe one major change
    15·2 answers
  • Please Help with thia question​
    6·1 answer
  • A cat runs 80 meters to the left in 16 seconds, then 50 meters to the right in 10 seconds, then 70 meters to the left in 14 seco
    9·1 answer
  • Three containers are filled with water to the same level. Identical marbles are dropped into all the three containers. In which
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!