B) Hope it helps ,Have a nice day :)
Answer:
a
b
c
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The angle of incidence is 
The refractive index of water is 
Generally Snell's law is mathematically represented as
Here 
is the refractive index of air with value 
is the angle of refraction
So
![\theta _2 = sin^{-1}[\frac{n_1 * sin(\theta _1)}{n_2} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctheta%20_2%20%20%3D%20%20sin%5E%7B-1%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7Bn_1%20%2A%20sin%28%5Ctheta%20_1%29%7D%7Bn_2%7D%20%5D)
=> ![\theta _2 = sin^{-1}[\frac{1.3 * sin(10)}{1} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctheta%20_2%20%20%3D%20%20sin%5E%7B-1%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B1.3%20%2A%20sin%2810%29%7D%7B1%7D%20%5D)
=>
Given that the angle should not be greater than 
then the angle of incidence will be
![\theta _1 = sin^{-1}[\frac{n_2 * sin(\theta _2)}{n_1} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctheta%20_1%20%20%3D%20%20sin%5E%7B-1%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7Bn_2%20%2A%20sin%28%5Ctheta%20_2%29%7D%7Bn_1%7D%20%5D)
=> ![\theta _1 = sin^{-1}[\frac{1 * sin(45)}{1.3} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctheta%20_1%20%20%3D%20%20sin%5E%7B-1%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%20%2A%20sin%2845%29%7D%7B1.3%7D%20%5D)
=>
Generally for critical angle is mathematically represented as
![\theta_c = sin^{-1}[\frac{n_2}{n_1} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctheta_c%20%20%3D%20%20sin%5E%7B-1%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7Bn_2%7D%7Bn_1%7D%20%5D)
=> ![\theta_c = sin^{-1}[\frac{1}{1.3} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctheta_c%20%20%3D%20%20sin%5E%7B-1%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1.3%7D%20%5D)
=>
Answer:
Explanation:
<u>Tangent and Angular Velocities</u>
In the uniform circular motion, an object describes the same angles in the same times. If 
is the angle formed by the trajectory of the object in a time t, then its angular velocity is
if is expressed in radians and t in seconds the units of w is rad/s. If the circular motion is uniform, the object forms an angle 
in 2t, or 
in 3t, etc. Thus the angular velocity is constant.
The magnitude of the tangent or linear velocity is computed as the ratio between the arc length and the time taken to travel that distance:
Replacing the formula for w, we have
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
