<u>Voltage:</u>
It is basically the difference between the charges of the materials on the ends of the Wire
<em>also known as potential difference</em>
It is very similar to the movement of air, it moves from higher density to lower density. in this case, the change in density is the potential difference
So, since voltage is the difference between the charge available on the ends of a wire. Even if the wire splits in parallel circuit, the difference of the charges remains the same
<em>the more the potential difference, the faster electrons will move to the material with lower charge</em>
<u>Current:</u>
Current is the amount of electrons moving through a cross-section of a wire in a period of time
So basically, it is the amount of electrons that move across a given point on a wire in a period of time
If the wire splits, we will have the same amount of electrons moving through as they would if the wire was not split but now, the electrons passing are divided and hence, if we measure the current after the split, we will find that we have a lower current
that's because we have less charge moving through the cross-section of the wire since some of those electrons are moving through a different wire
That's why the current splits in a parallel circuit
Answer:
The false statement has to be that neruotransmitters are in the spinal cord.
Explanation:
Neruotransmitters are in no was associated with the spinal cord. That is more related to nerves and muscles. Neurotransmitters are in the Phasma Membrane acording to sciencedirect.com.
The formula is F = ( q1 * q2 ) / r ^ 2
<span>where: q is the individual charges of each ion </span>
<span>r is the distance between the nuclei </span>
<span>The formula is not important but to explain the relationship between the atoms in the compounds and their lattice energy. </span>
<span>From the formula we can first conclude that compounds of ions with greater charges will have a greater lattice energy. This is a direct relationship. </span>
<span>For example, the compounds BaO and SrO, whose ions' charges are ( + 2 ) and ( - 2 ) respectively for each, will have greater lattice energies that the compounds NaF and KCl, whose ions' charges are ( + 1 ) and ( - 1 ) respectively for each. </span>
<span>So Far: ( BaO and SrO ) > ( NaF and KCl ) </span>
<span>The second part required you find the relative distance between the atoms of the compounds. Really, the lattice energy is stronger with smaller atoms, an indirect relationship. </span>
<span>For example, in NaF the ions are smaller than the ions in KCl so it has a greater lattice energy. Because Sr is smaller than Ba, SrO has a greater lattice energy than BaO. </span>
<span>Therefore: </span>
<span>Answer: SrO > BaO > NaF > KCl </span>
