A good diet. and exersise is the answer
The electromagnetic spectrum<span>. </span>Electromagnetic waves carry transverse vibrations in<span> electrical and </span>magnetic<span> fields, not vibrating particles. </span>Electromagnetic waves<span> do not need matter to travel through - they can travel through empty space AKA a vacuum </span>
Answer:
The total amount of CO₂ produced will be = 20680 kg/year
The reduction in the amount of CO₂ emissions by that household per year = 3102 kg/year
Explanation:
Given:
Power used by household = 14000 kWh
Fuel oil used = 3400 L
CO₂ produced of fuel oil = 3.2 kg/L
CO₂ produced of electricity = 0.70 kg/kWh
Now, the total amount of CO₂ produced will be = (14000 kWh × 0.70 kg/kWh) + (3400 L × 3.2 kg/L)
⇒ The total amount of CO₂ produced will be = 9800 + 10880 = 20680 kg/year
Now,
if the usage of electricity and fuel oil is reduced by 15%, the reduction in the amount of the CO₂ emission will be = 0.15 × 20680 kg/year = 3102 kg/year
Answer:
An amorphous solid does not have a definite melting point; instead, it melts gradually over a range of temperatures, because the bonds do not break all at once. This means an amorphous solid will melt into a soft, malleable state (think candle wax or molten glass) before turning completely into a liquid.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
May I get braineist pls?
Many people are in favor of the dam. Hydroelectric power is not as polluting
as other forms of electrical generation. The country is growing quickly, and
its economy is growing. The country must be able to produce more electricity
to meet everyone's needs. However, those opposed say the dams will force
many out of their homes. It will destroy an important wilderness area, and may
damage ecosystems - especially river or fjord ecosystems in Patagonia, since
silt won't be carried down rivers. Many also say that the project helps the
copper mining industry, and they believe that this project will benefit
businesses, not the people of Chile
