C. Tripling the length and reducing the radius by a factor of 2 is the change to a pipe would increase the conductance by a factor of 12.
<u>Explanation:</u>
As we know that the resistance is directly proportional to the length of the pipe and it is inversely proportional to the cross sectional area of the pipe.
So it is represented as,
R∝ l /A [ area is radius square]
So k is the proportionality constant used.
R = kl/A
Conductance is the inverse of resistance, so it is given as,
C= 1/R.
R₁ = kl₁ / A₁
R₂ = kl₂/A₂
R₂/R₁ = 1/12 [∵ conductance is the inverse of resistance]
= l₂A₁ / l₁A₂
If we chose l₁/l₂= 3 and A₂/A₁= 4 So R₂/R₁= 1/3×4 = 1/12
So tripling the length and reducing the radius by a factor of 2 would increase the conductance by a factor of 12.
Economic concerns is the correct one
If it’s a negative number and a positive it might be 1.4
Answer:
44 g
Explanation:
The formula for the number of moles (n) is equal to 
.
Since we need to find the mass, we derive it from the formula of the number of moles and we get that mass = n x molecular weight .
The molecular weight of 
= 12 g/mol (from the carbon) + 19x4 g/mol (from the 4 fluorine atoms)= 88 g/mol
We plug in the numbers in the derived formula for the mass and we get :
mass = n x molecular weight = 0.5 mol x 88 g/mol = 44 g
