Answer:
<u>structural arrangements</u>
_______________________________________
<h2>properties of daimond: </h2><h3>appearance: transparent</h3><h3>hardness: very hard</h3><h3>thermal conductivity :very poor</h3><h3>electric conductivity: poor</h3><h3>density:</h3>
<h3>uses: jewellery and drilling</h3>
_______________________________________
<h2>properties of graphite:</h2>
<h3>appearance: black shiny</h3><h3>hardness: soft ,slippery to touch</h3><h3>thermal conductivity : moderate</h3><h3>electric conductivity: good</h3><h3>density:</h3>
<h3>uses:dry cell, electric arc, pencil lead, lubricant</h3>
_______________________________________
<h2>How Diamond and Graphite are chemically identical?</h2>
- On heating diamond or graphite in the air, they burn completely to form carbon dioxide.
- - Equal quantities of diamond and graphite when burned, produce exactly the same amount of carbon dioxide.
_______________________________________
<h2>Why the physical properties of diamond and graphite are so different?</h2>
Due to the difference in the arrangement of carbon atoms in diamond and graphite
_______________________________________
<h2>
<em><u>hope</u></em><em><u> it</u></em><em><u> helps</u></em><em><u> you</u></em><em><u><</u></em><em><u>3</u></em></h2>
Yes, it is the power of material evidence that wins.
- Evidence used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis is known as material evidence.
- Evidence is also used by scientists in various contexts, such as when they apply ideas to real-world issues.
- Whether a person accepts the data as proof depends on their presumptions or views regarding how observations relate to a theory.
- A creative hypothesis is developed by a scientist and may be refuted by testing it against evidence or established truths.
- Evidence can refute a hypothesis by demonstrating facts that are at odds with it. In contrast, the presence of evidence does not preclude the possibility of future, undiscovered evidence supporting the idea.
Therefore, it is the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that
proves an answer in Science.
Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ9
The absorbance reported by the defective instrument was 0.3933.
Absorbance A = - log₁₀ T
Tm = transmittance measured by spectrophotometer
Tm = 0.44
Absorbance reported in this equipment = -log₁₀ (0.44) = 0.35654
True absorbance can be calculated by true transmittance, Tm = T+S(α-T)
S = fraction of stray light = 6%= 6/100 = 0.06
α= 1, ideal case
T = true transmittance of the sample
Tm = T+S(α-T)
now, T= Tm-S/ 1-S = 0.44-0.06/ 1-0.06 = 0.404233
therefore, actual reading measured is A = -log₁₀ T = -log₁₀ (0.404233)
i.e; 0.3933
To know more about transmittance click here:
brainly.com/question/17088180
#SPJ4
They are different because they formed at different distances from the sun.
Answer:
HCO₂
Explanation:
From the information given:
The mass of the elements are:
Carbon C = 26.7 g; Hydrogen H = 2.24 g Oxygen O = 71.1 g
To determine the empirical formula;
First thing is to find the numbers of moles of each atom.
For Carbon:
For Hydrogen:
For Oxygen:
Now; we use the smallest no of moles to divide the respective moles from above.
For carbon:
For Hydrogen:
For Oxygen:
Thus, the empirical formula is HCO₂
