Answer:
the force between the building and the ball is non-conservative (friction-type force)
Explanation
Explanation:For this exercise the student must create an impulse to move the ball towards the building, in this part he performs positive work since the applied force and the displacement are in the same direction.
When the ball moves it has a kinetic energy and if its height increases or decreases its potential energy also changes, but the sum of being must be equal to the initial work.
When the ball arrives and collides with the building, non-conservative forces, of various kinds; rubbing, breaking, etc. It transforms this energy into a part of heat and another in mechanical energy that the building must absorb, let us destroy its wall
Consequently, the force between the building and the ball is non-conservative (friction-type force
Explanation:
I think for anyone to answer this we need more info on what you want answered. The Sentence Itself doesn't Make Since To Me
Bergeron–Findeisen Process.
<h3>Answer:</h3>
The mechanical advantage would decrease, making the block more difficult to lift.
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
The mechanical advantage in such a setup is the ratio of distance from A to B to the distance from D to B. In this picture, that ratio is less than 1, meaning the advantage of having this setup is less than the advantage of no setup at all.
While the force required to lift the block is increased by this setup, the distance over which that force is applied will be smaller for raising the block to a given height. (Overall, for the same height, more work is required with the lever setup because you're raising part of the mass of the lever as well as the mass of the block.)
