1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
fomenos
3 years ago
5

Which best describe insane

Physics
2 answers:
fgiga [73]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I would say c

Explanation:

mash [69]3 years ago
4 0

in a state of mind that prevents normal perception, behavior, or social interaction; seriously mentally il

You might be interested in
Why is pseudoscience bad?
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

It is quite difficult to picture a pseudoscientist—really picture him or her over the course of a day, a year, or a whole career. What kind or research does he or she actually do, what differentiates him or her from a carpenter, or a historian, or a working scientist? In short, what do such people think they are up to?

… it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

The answer might surprise you. When they find time after the obligation of supporting themselves, they read papers in specific areas, propose theories, gather data, write articles, and, maybe, publish them. What they imagine they are doing is, in a word, “science”. They might be wrong about that—many of us hold incorrect judgments about the true nature of our activities—but surely it is a significant point for reflection that all individuals who have been called “pseudoscientists” have considered themselves to be “scientists”, with no prefix.

What is pseudoscience?

“Pseudoscience” is a bad category for analysis. It exists entirely as a negative attribution that scientists and non‐scientists hurl at others but never apply to themselves. Not only do they apply the term exclusively as a discrediting slur, they do so inconsistently. Over the past two‐and‐a‐quarter centuries since the term popped into the Western European languages, a great number of disparate doctrines have been categorized as sharing a core quality—pseudoscientificity, if you will—when in fact they do not. It is based on this diversity that I refer to such beliefs and theories as “fringe” rather than as “pseudo”: Their defining characteristic is the distance from the center of the mainstream scientific consensus in whichever direction, not some essential property they share.

Scholars have by and large tended to ignore fringe science as regrettable sideshows to the main narrative of the history of science, but there is a good deal to be learned by applying the same tools of analysis that have been used to understand mainstream science. This is not, I stress, to imply that there is no difference between hollow‐Earth theories and geophysics; on the contrary, the differences are the point of the analysis. Focusing on the historical and conceptual relationship between the fringe and the core of the various sciences as that blurry border has fluctuated over the centuries provides powerful analytical leverage for understanding where contemporary anti‐science movements come from and how mainstream scientists might address them.

As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be

The central claim of this essay is that the concept of “pseudoscience” was called into being as the shadow of professional science. Before science became a profession—with formalized training, credentialing, publishing venues, careers—the category of pseudoscience did not exist. As soon as professionalization blossomed, tagging competing theories as pseudoscientific became an important tool for scientists to define what they understood science to be. In fact, despite many decades of strenuous effort by philosophers and historians, a precise definition of “science” remains elusive. It should be noted however that the absence of such definitional clarity has not seriously inhibited the ability of scientists to deepen our understanding of nature tremendously.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
A spherical ball is dropped through a liquid, explain why it reaches terminal velocity.
Alekssandra [29.7K]

Probably because of the drag coefficient and the density of the liquid.

8 0
3 years ago
A string under a tension of 68 N is used to whirl a rock in a horizontal circle of radius 3.7 m at a speed of 16.53 m/s. The str
alekssr [168]

Answer:

F = 5253.7 N

Explanation:

As we know that tension force in the string will be equal to the centripetal force on the string

so we will have

T = \frac{mv^2}{L}

now we have

68 = \frac{m(16.53^2)}{3.7}

now we have

68 = 73.8 m

m = 0.92 kg

now when string length is 0.896 m and its speed is 71.5 m/s then we will have

F = \frac{mv^2}{r}

F = \frac{0.92(71.5^2)}{0.896}

F = 5253.7 N

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How and why will my weight change if i took a trip to the moon
MatroZZZ [7]

weight less on moon than on earth.

high on lift off - G force

low in orbit.

zero at a point between earth and moon

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
He electron cloud is the predicted location for
DanielleElmas [232]

Answer:

A) Electrons only

Explanation:

In quantum mechanics, "electron cloud" refers to the region of space where electrons can be found in an atom. In fact, in quantum mechanics, it is not possible to predict the exact position of the electrons, so there is a region where electrons have a certain probability to be found.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • To understand the terms in the Doppler shift formula.
    15·1 answer
  • .
    5·2 answers
  • Which measure of an earthquake depends on how close you are to the focus?
    14·1 answer
  • A horizontal black line at left labeled A has a blue arrow pointing down to it and another blue arrow pointing down from it. A h
    13·2 answers
  • How does emission spectra occur?
    13·1 answer
  • Written:
    9·1 answer
  • Question 8 (1 point) How many protons are in an element with an atomic number of 8 and a mass number of 18? a 3 b 8 c 10 d 18
    6·1 answer
  • Suppose you designed a spacecraft to work by photon pressure. The sail was a completely absorbing fabric of area 1.0 km2 and you
    12·1 answer
  • Two electromagnets are running with equal amounts of electric current. Electromagnet A uses a piece of iron as its metal core, w
    14·1 answer
  • Ifa cup of coffee is at 90°C and a person with a body temperature of 36°C touches it, how will heat flow between
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!