The process wherein it involves the circulation of questionnaires among the group members about a specific problem that they want to tackle is termed as the Delphi Technique. The group members should share the results within the circle then they should continue to recirculate and refine individual responses until a consensus regarding the problem is reached.
Having the direct opposite technique with the nominal group technique or the brainstorming, Delphi technique does not require group members to meet face to face.
These are the steps in taking the Delphi technique. The first step is identifying the problem. Next is, the group members shall then be asked to offer their solutions anonymously. They should answer the carefully designed questionnaires. Third, all the answers of all the members are then compiled and are also sent to all members in the group. After each of the members has already carefully evaluated each of the group member’s answers, they are then asked to generate new individual solutions. Lastly, until a consensus problem solution is arrived, steps 3 and 4 will be done repeatedly.
The advantage of practicing the Delphi technique is they do not have to meet face to face. This is important to those members who are geographically separated or to those who are too busy to meet.
An example of the Judicial Branch checking the power of another branch is best represented by the system of checks and balances.
<u>Explanation:</u>
To avoid overpowering of any one branch over the other branch functioning in a democracy, the system of checks and balances is put into place. This system allows the branches to experience a balance of power between all three.
It is because all the three branches supervise each other for their actions to be democratic.
I am pretty sure it's four. I looked it up, and I have a book I just looked through. Sorry if it's wrong! Have a good rest of 2016!
