Answer: Option (A) is the correct answer.
Explanation:
A corrective action is defined as the action with the help of which a person can avoid a difficulty or problem that he/she was facing earlier.
For example, when the chef checked the temperature of soup using thermometer then it was 120 but his operation's critical limit was 135.
So, to avoid this problem he heated the soup to 165 at 15 seconds following which he got the result as desired.
Therefore, reheating the soup was his corrective action.
Thus, we can conclude that reheating the soup was the corrective action.
Equilibrium force is the force that will keep the small
mass in place, hence no movement must be made. So we know that 32 N of force is
acted towards the positive direction so +32 N. Which is counteracted by 26 N
force so:
32 N – 26 N = 6 N (positive)
Since positive 6 is left, therefore this must be acted by
an equilibrant negative 6 N.
Answer:
<span>- 6 N </span>
Answer:
The angle of incidence is greater than the angle of refraction
Explanation:
Refraction occurs when a light wave passes through the boundary between two mediums.
When a ray of light is refracted, it changes speed and direction, according to Snell's Law:
where
:
is the index of refraction of the 1st medium
is the index of refraction of the 2nd medium
is the angle of incidence (the angle between the incident ray and the normal to the boundary)
is the angle of refraction (the angle between the refracted ray and the normal to the boundary)
In this problem, we have a ray of light passing from air into clear plastic. We have:
(index of refraction of air)
approx. (index of refraction in clear plastic)
Snell's Law can be rewritten as
![sin \theta_2 =\frac{n_1}{n_2}sin \theta_1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=sin%20%5Ctheta_2%20%3D%5Cfrac%7Bn_1%7D%7Bn_2%7Dsin%20%5Ctheta_1)
And since
, we have
![\frac{n_1}{n_2}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bn_1%7D%7Bn_2%7D%3C1)
And so
![\theta_2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctheta_2%3C%5Ctheta_1)
Which means that
The angle of incidence is greater than the angle of refraction
This is where we have to admit that gravitational potential energy is
one of those things that depends on the "frame of reference", or
'relative to what?'.
Potential energy = (mass) x (gravity) x (<em>height</em>).
So you have to specify <em><u>height above what</u></em> .
-- With respect to the ground, the ball has zero potential energy.
(If you let go of it, it will gain zero kinetic energy as it falls to
the ground.)
-- With respect to the floor in your basement, the potential energy is
(3) x (9.8) x (3 meters) = 88.2 joules.
(If you let go of it, it will gain 88.2 joules of kinetic energy as it falls
to the floor of your basement.)
-- With respect to the top of that 10-meter hill over there, the potential
energy is
(3) x (9.8) x (-10) = -294 joules
(Its potential energy is negative. After you let go of it, you have to give it
294 joules of energy that it doesn't have now, in order to lift it to the top of
the hill <em>where it will have zero</em> potential energy.)
I believe you mean 6.02*10^7 but you want to shift the decimal 7 times to the right which would be 60200000 (: