According to my astronomy book, it's about 0.206
Remember that density refers to the "mass per unit volume" of an object.
So, if an object had a mass of 100 grams and a volume of 100 milliliters, the density would be 100 grams / 100 ml.
In the question, water on the surface of the scale would add weight, so the mass of the object that you're weighing would appear to be heavier than it really is. If that happens, you'll incorrectly assume that the density is GREATER than it really is
As an example, suppose that there was 5 ml of water on the surface of the scale. Water has a density of 1 gram per milliliter (1 g/ml) so the water would add 5 grams to the object's weight. If we use the example above, the mass of the object would seem to be 105 grams, rather than 100 grams. So, you would calculate:
density = mass / volume
density = 105 grams / 100 ml
density = 1.05 g/ml
The effect on density would be that it would erroneously appear to be greater
Hope this helps!
Good luck
Answer:
V = 38.48 L
Explanation:
Given that,
No. of moles = 1.5 mol
Pressure, P = 700 torr
Temperature, T = 15°C = 288 K
We need to find the volume of the gas. The ideal gas equation is given by :
, R = L.Torr.K⁻¹.mol⁻¹
So, the required volume is equal to 38.48 L.
Answer:
I think that the trend that would be seen in the time column of the data table would be that the number of seconds would increase. I know this because for each flask, the concentration of sodium thiosulfate decreases, since less of it is being mixed with more water. Also, when the concentration of a substance decreases, then the reaction rate also decreases, as there will be fewer collisions with sulfuric acid if there are fewer moles of sodium thiosulfate. When there are fewer collisions in a reaction, the reaction itself will take longer, and so when the sodium thiosulfate is diluted, the reaction takes more time.
Explanation:
<em>I verify this is correct. </em>
Answer:
Error of parallax it usually occurs when the cylinder is above or below the eye level,and thus resulting in differences In reading the millimeters