All categories

3 years ago

A yellow ball with a mass of 2 kg is rolling across the floor at 3 m's A red ball with a mass of 3 kg is rolling across the

2 answers:

6 0

Answer:
The red ball has a greater kinetic energy, because it has a greater mass

Explanation:
Mass is directly proportional to kinetic energy, as one increases, so does the other

MrRa [10]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The red ball has greater kinetic energy, because it has a greater mass

Explanation:

just look at the formula : K.E. = 1/2 m v(^2) (the ^2 is an exponent.)

You might be interested in

A paintball’s mass is 0.0032kg. A typical paintball strikes a target moving at 85.3 m/s.

vekshin1

Answer:

A) If the paintball stops completely the magnitude of the change in the paintball’s momentum is $p=0.273kg*m/s$

B) If the paintball bounces off its target and afterward moves in the opposite direction with the same speed, the change in the paintball’s momentum is $p=0.546kg*m/s$

C) A paintball bouncing off your skin in the opposite direction with the same speed hurts more than a paintball exploding upon your skin because of the strength exerted is twice than if it explodes.

Explanation:

A) We use the formula of momentum $p=mv$ , so we have $p=0.0032kg*85.3m/s=0.273kg*m/s$

B) We use the same formula above, then due we have a change of direction at the same speed, therefore the change in the momentum is the double so

$p=2*0.0032kg*85.3m/s=0.546kg*m/s$ .

C) The average strength of the force an object exerts during impact is determined by the amount the object’s momentum changes. therefore

$F=\frac{\Delta p}{\Delta t}$ , as we don't have any data about the impact time but we know momentum is twice, time does no matter and strength is twice too.

4 0

3 years ago

At the county fair, Chris throws a 0.12kg baseball at a 2.4kg wooden milk bottle, hoping to knock it off its stand and win a pri

viva [34]

Answer:

$v_{f2}$ =6.5% $v_{i1}$

Explanation:

Mass of the ball: $m_{1} =0.12kg$ ]

Initial velocity of the ball: $v_{i1}$

final velocity of the ball: $v_{f1}$ which is -30/100 of $v_{i1}$ = $-0.3v_{i1}$

Mass of the bottle: $m_{2} =2.4kg$

Initial velocity of the bottle: $v_{i2}=0m/s$

final velocity of the bottle: $v_{f2}$ is unknown (to find)

by using conservation momentum, which stated that the initial momentum is equal to the final momentum.

$m_{1} v_{i1} +m_{2} v_{i2} =m_{1} v_{f1} +m_{2} v_{f2}$

so since the bottle is at rest firstly, therefore $v_{i2} =0$

$m_{1} v_{i1} +m_{2} (0) =m_{1} v_{f1} +m_{2} v_{f2}$

$m_{1} v_{i1} =m_{1} v_{f1} +m_{2} v_{f2}$ equation 1

so now substitute $v_{f1}$ into equation 1

$m_{1} v_{i1} =m_{1} (-0.3v_{i1} ) +m_{2} v_{f2}$

$m_{1} v_{i1} = -0.3m_{1}v_{i1} +m_{2} v_{f2}$

collect the like terms

$m_{1} v_{i1} +0.3m_{1}v_{i1} =m_{2} v_{f2}$

$1.3m_{1} v_{i1} =m_{2} v_{f2}$

divide both side by $m_{2}$

$v_{f2}=\frac{1.3m_{1} v_{i1}}{m_{2} }$

Now substitute

$v_{f2} =\frac{1.3*0.12*v_{i1}}{2.4}\\v_{f2} =\frac{0.156v_{i1} }{2.4} \\v_{f2} =0.065v_{i1}$

$v_{f2} =$ 6.5% $v_{i1}$

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A straight segment of a current-carrying wire has a current element IL where I = 2.70 A and L = 3.20 cm i + 4.30 cm j. The segme

myrzilka [38]

The component of the force in negative z-direction is -0.144 N.

The given parameters;

current in the wire, I = 2.7 A
length of the wire, L = (3.2 i + 4.3j) cm
magnetic filed, B = 1.24 i

The force on the segment of the wire is calculated as follows;

$F = ILBsin(\theta)$

where;

θ is the angle wire and magnetic field

The force on the wire segment will be perpendicular in negative z-direction (applying right hand rule), so there won't be any x and y component of the force.

The angle between the wire and the magnetic field is calculated as follows;

$\theta = tan^{-1} (\frac{y}{x} )\\\\\theta = tan^{-1} (\frac{4.3}{3.2} )\\\\\theta = 53.3 \ ^0$

The magnitude of the wire length is calculated as follows;

$|l | = \sqrt{3.2^2 + 4.3^2} = 5.36 \ cm = 0.0536 \ m$

The component of the force in negative z-direction is calculated as;

$F_z = -ILB sin(\theta)\\\\F_z = -2.7 \times 0.0536 \times 1.24 \times sin(53.3)\\\\F_z = -0.144 \ N$

Thus, the component of the force in negative z-direction is -0.144 N.

Learn more here:brainly.com/question/22719779

6 0

3 years ago

Should i beat up my sibling cause they mean to me?

Vlada [557]

no thats messed up lol

4 0

3 years ago

Nearly all liquids and solids are nearly opaque to radiation at nearly all wavelengths. why is that

anastassius [24]

As radiation enters a solid or liquid, the light waves are absorbed and reflected by the atoms. the resulting reflection from an atom can be in any direction and is random. you can understand opacity in terms of the scattering of radiation. The more opaque, the more scattering.

(The truth is far more complicated than this, check out Richard Feynmans lectures on "Quantum Electro Dynamics" to learn the reality of it. )

3 0

3 years ago