Answer:
C. The motor tasks performed in the experiment were too simple.
On this case is the best option since the student wants to explain the effect of motor imagery and action observation together into the excitability. And maybe is too simple, since we need to cover other possibilities in order to analyze the excitability.
Explanation:
A. The procedure used did not include MEP recordings prior to each task.
Not true, is not a requisite record MEP prior to the task to evaluate the variable of interest on this case.
B. MEP amplitudes in an individual are typically highly consistent.
The Motor evoked potentials (MEP) "are electrical signals recorded from neural tissue or muscle after activation of central motor pathways". But on this case that's a technical aspect related to the topic and this not would be the reason why we need to withhold the presentation
C. The motor tasks performed in the experiment were too simple.
On this case is the best option since the student wants to explain the effect of motor imagery and action observation together into the excitability. And maybe is too simple, since we need to cover other possibilities in order to analyze the excitability.
D. The six different conditions were run in random order.
That's not true the student are not analyzing 6 different conditions, just 2.
Answer:
Final speed of the bullet is 228.3 m/s
Explanation:
As we know that there is no external force on the system of wooden block and the bullet
so we can say momentum of the system is conserved here
so here we can say
so we will have
Explanation:
its the minimum amount of energy required to remove the most loosely bound electron
Answer:
I am going to say A
Explanation:
solids are normally close and tightly packed molecules and while ice is in solid form,so is it.
Let me know if i was right! Hope this helps! :)
