Answer: im not writting a pharaphraph. Buuuuuuuuuuuut... explian the type of reaction then explanie how that type of reaction works.
Explanation:
Answer:
the new pressure is 2.09 atm
Explanation:
you have to use gay lussac's law so the formula is
p1/t1 = p2/t2
and convert C to Kelvin k=C+273.15
1.72atm/294.15 = p2/358.15
solve for p2 by multiplying 358.15 on both sides
p2=2.09 atm
<span>The calculation of quantities in chemical equations are called Stoichiometry. Stoichiometry is a branch of chemistry which deals with relative quantities of reactants and products in chemical reactions. The correct answer is 'Stoichoimetry'. I hope this helps you. </span>
Explanation:
Equation of reaction:
CO + 2H₂ ⇒ CH₃OH + energy
a. An increase in pressure:
A change in pressure affects only equilibrium involving a gas or gases. Le Chatelier's principle can be used to predict the direction of displacement.
An increase in pressure on an equilibrium system will shift the position of equilibrium to the side having smaller volume and vice-versa
CO + 2H₂ ⇒ CH₃OH + energy
3 moles 1 moles
An increase in pressure will favor the forward reaction to be favored.
b. Addition of H₂:
An in concentration of a specie favors the direction that uses up that specie and lowers its concentration.
Addition of hydrogen gas increases the concentration of amount of substances reacting.
To annul the effect of the reactant, more the product is given. The equilibrium shifts in the forward direction.
learn more:
equilibrium brainly.com/question/5877801
#learnwithBrainly
<span>Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientific journal. Several months later, they received the paper back from the publisher with many comments attached from several fellow scientists. It is either that they revise their study or replicate the study. Most scientists would revisit their work and the findings they had from their research. Most probable if they were successful and the comments of the publisher and the co-scientists were positive they could replicate the study to validate its accountability.<span>
</span></span>