All categories

3 years ago

Examine the scenario.

2 answers:

8 0

The answer is "A magnetic field influences the motion of charged particles. The negatively-charged particles will experience a force acting against their motion, so the negatively-charged particles would slow down and stop moving."

This is because for example;

Have you ever seen a magnet? If so, you would experience the same scienario as above.

aniked [119]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

option (c)

Explanation:

According to the Fleming's left hand rule, if we spread out thumb, fore finger and middle finger of our left hand mutually perpendicular to each other, then thumb represents the direction of force, fore finger represents the direction of magnetic field and the middle finger represents the direction of current.

According to the question, positive charge particle moves in left wards direction, i.e., current is flowing towards left, the force is acting upwards, so the direction of magnetic field is in perpendicular outwards to the plane of paper.

When a negatively charged particle moves towards left , then the direction of force is downwards.

Thus, the magnetic field influences the motion of charged particles. The negatively-charged particles will experience a force downward because positive and negative particles would experience forces in opposite directions.

You might be interested in

According to Newton's second law of motion, if we have a rigid, unchanging mass and we observe it accelerating, what must be hap

kkurt [141]

The force is applied to the accelerating object that has a constant mass. Option A is correct.

<h3>What does Newton's second law of motion state?</h3>

The force applied to the object is the product of its mass and acceleration.

$F = ma$

Where,

$F$ - force

$m$ - mass

$a$ - acceleration

From the equation, the force and the acceleration are in a proportional relation. The mass is not changing as given in the question.

Therefore, the force is applied to the accelerating object that has a constant mass.

Learn more about Acceleration:

brainly.com/question/2437624

8 0

2 years ago

A stone is thrown vertically downward with an initial speed of 12.0 m/s from the top of a building. The stone takes 1.54 s to re

mr_godi [17]

(a) The stone travels a vertical distance y of

y = (12.0 m/s) t + 1/2 g t ²

where g = 9.80 m/s² is the acceleration due to gravity. Note that this equation assume the downward direction to be positive, and that y = 0 corresponds to the height from which the stone is thrown.

So if it reaches the ground in t = 1.54 s, then the height of the building y is

y = (12.0 m/s) (1.54 s) + 1/2 (9.80 m/s²) (1.54 s)² ≈ 30.1 m

(b) The stone's (downward) velocity v at time t is

v = 12.0 m/s + g t

so that after t = 1.54 s, its velocity is

v = 12.0 m/s + (9.80 m/s²) (1.54 s) ≈ 27.1 m/s

(and of course, speed is the magnitude of velocity)

8 0

2 years ago

Can someone pleaseeee answer this !!!!!!

LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

The person with locked legs will experience greater impact force.

Explanation:

Let the two persons be of nearly equal mass (say m)

The final velocity of an object (person) dropped from a height H (here 2 meters) is given by,

$v=\sqrt{2gH}$

( $g$ = acceleration due to gravity)

which can be derived from Newton's equation of motion,

$v^2=u^2+2aS$

Now, the time taken (say $t$ ) for the momentum ( $mv$ ) to change to zero will be more in the case of the person who bends his legs on impact than who keeps his legs locked.

We know that,

$Force=\frac{\Delta(mv)}{t}$

Naturally, the person who bends his legs will experience lesser force since $t$ is larger.

3 0

2 years ago

Most street lights are made from one or two elements mercury or sodium. Explain why astronomers preferred that cities you sodium

lora16 [44]

Mercury is very harmful to the average human being. the mercury can easily be released from the lamp if the lamp is knocked over and broken. mercury is also harmful if inhaled. sodium on the other hand is not harmful in any way.

4 0

3 years ago

NASA is concerned about the ability of a future lunar outpost to store the supplies necessary to support the astronauts the supp

IRINA_888 [86]

Complete question :

NASA is concerned about the ability of a future lunar outpost to store the supplies necessary to support the astronauts the supply storage area of the lunar outpost where gravity is 1.63m/s/s can only support 1 x 10 over 5 N. What is the maximum WEIGHT of supplies, as measured on EARTH, NASA should plan on sending to the lunar outpost?

Answer:

601000 N

Explanation:

Given that :

Acceleration due to gravity at lunar outpost = 1.6m/s²

Supported Weight of supplies = 1 * 10^5 N

Acceleration due to gravity on the earth surface = 9.8m/s²

Maximum weight of supplies as measured on EARTH :

Ratio of earth gravity to lunar post gravity:

(Earth gravity / Lunar post gravity) ;

(9.8 / 1.63) = 6.01

Hence, maximum weight of supplies as measured on EARTH should be :

6.01 * (1 × 10^5)

6.01 × 10^5

= 601000 N

3 0

3 years ago