1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saw5 [17]
3 years ago
5

What effect does increasing the concentration of a dissolved solute have on each of the colligative properties?

Chemistry
1 answer:
Igoryamba3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

If we increase the concentration of a dissolved solute, the solution would have a vapor pressure so much low, the boiling temperature for the solution will be so high, freezing point for the solution will be so much low and the osmotic pressure will be higher.

Colligative properties always depends on dissolved particles (solute)

Explanation:

These are the colligative properties

- Vapor pressure lowering

ΔP = P° . Xm

Vapor pressure of pure solvent - Vapor pressure of solution.

If we add more solute, it would raise the Xm, so the solution would have a vapor pressure so much low.

Vapor pressure pure solvent - Vapor pressure solution ↑ = P° . Xm ↑

- Boiling point elevation

ΔT = Kb . m

When we add more solute, we are increasing the molality.

↑T° boiling of solution - T° boiling pure solvent = Kf . m ↑

Boiling temperature for the solution will be so high.

- Freezing point depression

When we add more solute, we are increasing the molality.

ΔT = Kf . m

T° fussion of pure solvent - ↓T° fussion of solution = Kf . m↑

Freezing point for the solution will be so much low.

- Osmotic pressure

π = M . R . T

When we add solute, molarity is increasing. Therefore the osmotic pressure will be higher.

π↑ = M↑ . R . T

You might be interested in
Increasing technology addiction among the youth write a letter to editor
ruslelena [56]

Answer:

these two would help you

Explanation:

have a good day ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

6 0
2 years ago
Which is the correct complete ionic equation for the reaction of
cricket20 [7]

Answer:

b) 2H+(aq) + 2C1-(aq) + Zn(s) → H2(g) + Zn2+(aq) + 2Cl-(aq)

Explanation:

The equation is given as;

2HCl(aq) + Zn(s) + H2(g) + ZnCl2(aq)

In writing an ionic equation, only the aqueous compounds dissociates into ions. This means HCl and ZnCl2 would dissociate to form ions.

This is given as;

2H+  +  2Cl-  + Zn(s) --> H2(g) + Zn2+  + 2Cl-

The correct option is;

b) 2H+(aq) + 2C1-(aq) + Zn(s) → H2(g) + Zn2+(aq) + 2Cl-(aq)

8 0
2 years ago
The Best Answer Will Be Rated Brainliest!
statuscvo [17]
The answer is flourine

flourine some what sounds like flow so

flourine is a flowing element
4 0
3 years ago
One question please help!
Agata [3.3K]
<span>1 trial : you have nothing to compare the result with - you don't know if it's a mistake.
2 trials : you can compare results - if very different, one may have gone wrong, but which one?
3 trials : if 2 results are close and 3rd far away, 3rd probably unreliable and can be rejected.

******************************

First calculate the enthalpy of fusion. M, C and m,c = mass and specific heat of calorimeter and water; n, L = mass and heat of fusion of ice; T = temperature fall.

L = (mc+MC)T/n.

c=4.18 J/gK. I assume calorimeter was copper, so C=0.385 J/gK.

1. M = 409g, m = 45g. T = 22c, n = 14g
L = (45*4.18+409*0.385)*22/14 = 543.0 J/g.

2. M = 409g, m = 49g, T = 20c, n = 13g
L = (49*4.18+409*0.385)*20/13 = 557.4 J/g.

3. M = 409g, m = 54g, T = 20c, n = 14g
L = (54*4.18+409*0.385)*20/14 = 547.4 J/g.

(i) Estimate error in L from spread of 3 results.
Average L = 549.3 J/g.
average of squared differences (variance) = (6.236^2+8.095^2+1.859^2)/3 = 35.96
standard deviation = 5.9964
standard error = SD/(N-1) = 5.9964/2 = 3 J/g approx.

% error = 3/547 x 100% = 0.5%.

(ii) Estimate error in L from accuracy of measurements:
error in masses = +/-0.5g
error in T = +/-0.5c

For Trial 3
M = 409g, error = 0.5g
m = 463-409, error = sqrt(0.5^2+0.5^2) = 0.5*sqrt(2)
n =(516-463)-(448-409)=14, error = 0.5*sqrt(4) = 1.0g
K = (mc+MC)=383, error = sqrt[2*(0.5*4.18)^2+(0.5*0.385)^2] = 2.962

L = K*T/n
% errors are
K: 3/383 x 100% = 0.77
T: 0.5/20 x 100% = 2.5
n: 1.0/14 x 100% = 7.14

% errors in K and T are << error in n, so we can ignore them.
% error in L = same as in n = 7% x 547.4 = 40 (always round final error to 1 sig fig).

*************************************

The result is (i) L= 549 +/- 3 J/g or (ii) L = 550 +/- 40 J/g.
Both are very far above accepted figure of 334 J/g, so there is at least one systematic error in the experiment or the calculations.
eg calorimeter may not be copper, so C is not 0.385 J/gK. (If it was polystyrene, which absorbs/ transmits little heat, the effective value of C would be very low, reducing L.)
Using +/- 40 is probably best (more cautious).
However, the spread in the actual results is much smaller; try to explain this discrepancy - eg
* measurements were "fiddled" to get better results; other Trials were made but only best 3 were chosen.
* measurements were more accurate than I assumed (eg masses to nearest 0.1g but rounded to 1g when written down).

Other sources of error:
L=(mc+MC)T/n is too high, so n (ice melted) may be too small, or T (temp fall) too high - why?
* it is suspicious that all final temperatures were 0c - was this actually measured or just guessed? a higher final temp would reduce L.
* we have assumed initial and final temperature of ice was 0c, it may actually have been colder, so less ice would melt - this could explain small values of n
* some water might have been left in container when unmelted ice was weighed (eg clinging to ice) - again this could explain small n;
* poor insulation - heat gained from surroundings, melting more ice, increasing n - but this would reduce measured L below 334 J/g not increase it.
* calorimeter still cold from last trial when next one started, not given time to reach same temperature as water - this would reduce n.
Hope This Helps :)
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
The density of potassium, which has the BCC structure, is 0.855 g/cm3. The atomic weight of potassium is 39.09 g/mol. Calculate
Nimfa-mama [501]

Answer:

lattice parameter = 5.3355x10^-8 cm

atomic radius = 2.3103x10^-8 cm

Explanation:

known data:

p=0.855 g/cm^3

atomic mass = 39.09 g/mol

atoms/cell = 2 atoms

Avogadro number = 6.02x10^23 atom/mol

a) the lattice parameter:

Since potassium has a cubic structure, its volume is equal to:

v = [(atoms/cell)x(atomic mass)/(p)x(Avogadro number)]

substituting values:

v =[(2)x(39.09)/(0.855x6.02x10^23)]=1.5189x10^-22 cm^3

but as the cell volume is

a^3 =v

a=\sqrt[3]{v}=\sqrt[3]{1.5189x10^{-22} } = 5.3355x10^-8 cm

for a BCC structure, the atomic radius is equal to

r=\frac{ax\sqrt{3} }{4}=\frac{5.3355x10^{-8}x\sqrt{3}  }{4}=2.3103x10^{-8}cm

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Balance the chemical equation by indicating the number of each species in the appropriate blanks. For this exercise, indicate co
    12·1 answer
  • The energy level has the lowest energy.
    14·1 answer
  • How are catapults an example of a third class lever? Please explain!
    12·1 answer
  • Why do chemists use the Lewis symbols to represent chlorine and sodium rather than drawing the electron diagrams of each element
    5·1 answer
  • Will essential oil penetrate through clothes
    13·2 answers
  • How many atoms are equal to 4.61 moles of carbon?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following is not a compound? HCl Cl2 NaCI CO2
    13·1 answer
  • The reaction of Pb+4 and O-2 produces the compound of
    6·1 answer
  • What is the substance? cdH) (Η) (Η<br> (H)C<br> cco<br> Ή) (Η<br> Η<br> Η
    15·1 answer
  • Choose one side of the debate below, and form a brief argument supporting that side.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!