All categories

3 years ago

A same of gas in a rigid container is at 25.0Cand 1.00atm. What is the pressure of the sample when heated to 220.0C

Chemistry

1 answer:

Crazy boy [7]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

1.654 atm.

Explanation:

We can use the general law of ideal gas: PV = nRT.

where, P is the pressure of the gas in atm.

V is the volume of the gas in L.

n is the no. of moles of the gas in mol.

R is the general gas constant,

T is the temperature of the gas in K.

If n and V are constant, and have different values of P and T:

(P₁T₂) = (P₂T₁)

Knowing that:

P₁ = 1.0 atm, T₁ = 25°C + 273 = 298 K,

P₂ = ??? atm, T₂ = 220°C + 273 = 493 K,

Applying in the above equation

(P₁T₂) = (P₂T₁)

∴ P₂ = (P₁T₂)/(T₁) = (1.0 atm)(493 K)/(298 K) = 1.654 atm.

You might be interested in

Imagine the movement of a single gas molecule inside a container. Explain the particles motions in terms of kinetic- molecular t

Nikitich [7]

Answer:

we know that gas molecules move fast by hitting the container and they never meet,so if we have one single gas molecule then it will move slower . This is because it is alone in an empty container so until it hits the container to change it's movements it will make the process slower.

Read the explanation below to have a better idea based on the kinetic molecular theory.

Explanation:

Hello in this question we have a container and in it is a single gas molecule. So there is our gas molecule and in fact right there that violates the kinetic molecular theory. Because the kinetic molecular theory thinks of these particles as being dimension less points. Because there is so much space between particles. The particles themselves have such an insignificant volume as they can be thought of as dimension lys points. Okay. But anyway this particle is in rapid motion and this motion is essentially random. So it's moving and it will eventually hit the wall of its container. It's moving rapidly so it's going to hit it pretty quickly and when it hits the wall of that container Yeah, it is going to bounce off when it does that. It's a totally elastic collision. So that means there will be no energy transfer, no energy loss, no energy gained. It will just serve to change the direction of the particle. So when it hits the wall it's going to bounce back off the wall and continue in a straight line until it hits another wall and then it will bounce off that wall and it will continue moving in this motion in this motion its speed is related to the amount of energy it has and therefore its temperature. So if we add heat, it will move faster. If we remove heat or cool it down, it will move slower. So when we remove heat, it will move slower. The kinetic molecular theory says it will be constantly moving As long as it is above absolute zero. It's only at absolute zero or 0 Kelvin, where would stop moving. Okay, so all these things describe its motion. It's in rapid random motion in a straight line until it hits the wall of its container. Then it will rebound without a transfer of any energy. It will be totally elastic collision. If we were to heat it up, it would move faster. If we were to cool it down, it would move more slowly, we would have to cool it all the way down to absolute zero before it would stop moving. Right, so all of these things describe its motion. In terms of that kinetic molecular theory,

5 0

2 years ago

If we start with 1.000 g of strontium-90, 0.805 g will remain after 9.00 yr. This means that the of strontium-90 is ________ yr.

lesantik [10]

The question is incomplete, here is the complete question.

If we start with 1.000 g of strontium-90, 0.805 g will remain after 9.00 yr. This means that the half-life of strontium-90 is ________ yr.

a. 28.8 b. 30.9 c. 35.4 d. 32.2

Answer : The half-life of strontium-90 is 28.8 years.

Explanation :

This is a type of radioactive decay and all radioactive decays follow first order kinetics.

First we have to calculate the rate constant.

Expression for rate law for first order kinetics is given by :

$k=\frac{2.303}{t}\log\frac{a}{a-x}$

where,

k = rate constant

t = time taken for decay process = 9.00 year

a = initial amount or moles of the reactant = 1.000 g

a - x = amount or moles left after decay process = 0.805 g

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$k=\frac{2.303}{9.00}\log\frac{1.00}{0.805}$

$k=0.0241\text{ year}^{-1}$

To calculate the half-life, we use the formula :

$k=\frac{0.693}{t_{1/2}}$

$0.0241\text{ year}^{-1}=\frac{0.693}{t_{1/2}}$

$t_{1/2}=28.8\text{ years}$

Therefore, the half-life of strontium-90 is 28.8 years.

5 0

3 years ago

10. Summarize the effect of hydrogen bonding on boiling point.

oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

10. it increases the boiling point because it is a stone bond and will require much energy to break it.

11.So, to boil liquid water, all hydrogen bonds have to be broken and it requires a large amount of energy. This isn't the case in HF; all hydrogen bonds need not to be broken, and therefore a lesser amount of energy is required. So HF boils at a much lower temperature as compared to water even though F has high electronegativity but the force of attraction or the intermolecular is is weak

7 0

2 years ago

Which solution will form a precipitate when mixed with a solution of aqueous na2co3? which solution will form a precipitate when

trapecia [35]

Answer:

$CuCl_{2}(aq.)$ will form a precipitate of insoluble $CuCO_{3}$ when aqueous $Na_{2}CO_{3}$ is added.

Explanation:

According to solubility rule-

all carbonates are insoluble except group IA compounds and $NH_{4}^{+}$

all salts of sodium are soluble

When $Na_{2}CO_{3}$ is added to given solutions, a double displacement reaction takes place in each solution to form a sodium salt and a carbonate salt.

So, in accordance with solubility rule, addition of $Na_{2}CO_{3}$ into $CuCl_{2}(aq.)$ will result precipitation of insoluble $CuCO_{3}$

Reaction: $Na_{2}CO_{3}(aq.)+CuCl_{2}(aq.)\rightarrow 2NaCl(aq.)+CuCO_{3}(aq.)$

4 0

3 years ago

Water has a “bent” geometry. Which explanation does not explain why?

pogonyaev

What are the answer choices ?

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers