I believe the best answer is law, as scientific laws are accepted to be true under the proper conditions.
Answer:
No, it is not proper to use an infinitely long cylinder model when finding the temperatures near the bottom or top surfaces of a cylinder.
Explanation:
A cylinder is said to be infinitely long when is of a sufficient length. Also, when the diameter of the cylinder is relatively small compared to the length, it is called infinitely long cylinder.
Cylindrical rods can also be treated as infinitely long when dealing with heat transfers at locations far from the top or bottom surfaces. However, it not proper to treat the cylinder as being infinitely long when:
* When the diameter and length are comparable (i.e have the same measurement)
When finding the temperatures near the bottom or top of a cylinder, it is NOT PROPER TO USE AN INFINITELY LONG CYLINDER because heat transfer at those locations can be two-dimensional.
Therefore, the answer to the question is NO, since it is not proper to use an infinitely long cylinder when finding temperatures near the bottom or top of a cylinder.
Answer:2800000j
Explanation:
For us to know the kinetic energy of the vehicle,
Where m is the mass
And v is the velocity
Then, K.E=1/2mv^2
While, K.E=1/2×3500×40^2
Therefore, our answer will now be
K.E=2800000j
Answer:
work done is -150 kJ
Explanation:
given data
volume v1 = 2 m³
pressure p1 = 100 kPa
pressure p2 = 200 kPa
internal energy = 10 kJ
heat is transferred = 150 kJ
solution
we know from 1st law of thermodynamic is
Q = du +W ............1
put here value and we get
-140 = 10 + W
W = -150 kJ
as here work done is -ve so we can say work is being done on system