Answer:
B) mostly empty space and has a small, positively charged nucleus
Explanation:
In the gold foil experiment, positively-charged alpha particles were directed towards a gold foil sheet. During the experiment, most of the particles went through the gold foil. However, a select few alpha particles were met with resistance and bounced off the sheet.
This proves that the gold atoms, which made up the gold foil sheet, were mostly empty space as most of the alpha particles passed through it. Furthermore, the particles which bounced off the sheet must have hit small, positively-charged nuclei. The nuclei must have been positive because similar charges repel each other. In other words, if the nuclei were negatively-charged, the positively-charged alpha particles would not bounce off the sheet, but instead "stick" to it.
I believe D has the largest radius out of the other 3.
Answer: Given equal masses, water will heat up less than wood if the same heat is added.
Original Recipe
1 (18 1/4 ounce) Box devils food cake mix
1/2 cup vegetable oil
2 large eggs
Confectioners' Sugar (for rolling)
Directions:
Preheat oven to 350 degrees. Stir (by hand) cake mix, oil, and eggs- until dough forms. Dust with sugar and shape into 1 inch balls. Roll balls in sugar and place on ungreased cookie sheet. Bake 8-10 minutes. Remove from pan after one minute and put on cooling rack.
Cooking for 17 people
My original yield was 30 cookies.
17 cookies (1box cake mix/30 cookies)= .56 of a box= 1/2 box
17 cookies (1/2 cup oil/30 cookies)= .283 cups of oil= 1/4 cups
17 cookies (2 eggs/30 cookies)= 1.13 eggs= 1 egg
Percent Yeild
I was able to bake 24 cookies, with my original yeild being 30.
(24 cookies/30 cookies) x 100= 80% yeild
<span>Limiting Reactant Project
Fudge Crinkles</span>
By Autumn Gordon
Limiting Reactant
I have...
1 box of cake mix
48 oz or 6 cups of oil
12 eggs
Limiting is cake mix.
Left over is...
5.5 cups of oil
10 eggs<span>
</span>
Answer: The rate of the loss of 
is 0.52M/s
Explanation:
Rate law says that rate of a reaction is directly proportional to the concentration of the reactants each raised to a stoichiometric coefficient determined experimentally called as order.
The rate in terms of reactants is given as negative as the concentration of reactants is decreasing with time whereas the rate in terms of products is given as positive as the concentration of products is increasing with time.
Rate of disappearance of =![-\frac{1d[O_3]}{2dt}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=-%5Cfrac%7B1d%5BO_3%5D%7D%7B2dt%7D)
Rate of formation of 
=![+\frac{1d[O_2]}{3dt}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%2B%5Cfrac%7B1d%5BO_2%5D%7D%7B3dt%7D)
![-\frac{1d[O_3]}{2dt}=+\frac{1d[O_2]}{3dt}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=-%5Cfrac%7B1d%5BO_3%5D%7D%7B2dt%7D%3D%2B%5Cfrac%7B1d%5BO_2%5D%7D%7B3dt%7D)
Rate of formation of = 
Thus Rate of disappearance of =![\frac{2d[O_2]}{3dt}=\frac{2}{3}\times 7.78\times 10^{-1}M/s=0.52M/s](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B2d%5BO_2%5D%7D%7B3dt%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B3%7D%5Ctimes%207.78%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-1%7DM%2Fs%3D0.52M%2Fs)
