1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naddik [55]
3 years ago
9

A 20 KeV electron emits two bremsstrahlung photons as it is being brought to rest in two successive decelerations. The wavelengt

h of the second photon is 1.30 A longer than the wavelength of the first. (a) What was the energy of the electron after the first deceleration, and (b) what are the wavelengths of the photons
Physics
1 answer:
Degger [83]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

λ₁ = 87.5 10⁻¹² m ,  λ₂ =  2.175 10⁻¹⁰ m,    E₂ = 5.8 10³ eV

Explanation:

In this case you can use the law of conservation of energy, all the energy of the electron is converted into energized emitted photons

Let's reduce to the SI system

          E₀ = 20 10³ eV (1.6 10⁻¹⁹ J / 1eV) = 3.2 10⁻¹⁵ J

          Δλ = 1.30 A = 0.13 nm = 0.13 10⁻⁹ m

          Ef = E₁ + E₂

         E₀ = Ef

         E₀ = E₁ + E₂

The energy can be found with the Planck equation

          E = h f

          c = λ f

          f = c / λ

          E = hc / λ

They indicate that the wavelength of the second photon is

 

           λ₂ =  λ₁ +0.130 10⁻⁹

We replace

           E₀ = hv / λ₁ + hc / ( λ₁ + 0.130 10⁺⁹)

           E₀ / hv = 1 / λ₁ + 1 / ( λ₁ + 0.13 10⁻⁹)

          3.2 10⁻¹⁵ / (6.63 10⁻³⁴ 3 10⁸) = ( λ₁ + 0.13 10⁻⁹ +  λ₁) /  λ₁ ( λ₁ + 0.13 10⁻⁹)

          1.6 10¹⁰ ( λ₁² +0.13 10⁻⁹  λ₁) = 2  λ₁ + 0.13 10⁻⁹

           λ₁² + 0.13 10⁻⁹  λ₁ = 1.25 10⁻¹⁰  λ₁ + 8.125 10⁻²¹

            λ₁² + 0.005 10⁻⁹  λ₁ = 8.125 10⁻²¹

            λ₁² + 5 10⁻¹²  λ₁ - 8.125 10⁻²¹ = 0

Let's solve the second degree equation

            λ₁ = [-5 10⁻¹² ±√((5 10⁻¹²)² + 4 8.125 10⁻²¹)] / 2

    λ₁ = [-5 10⁻¹² ±√(25 10⁻²⁴ +32.5 10⁻²¹)] / 2 = [-5 10⁻¹² ±√ (32525 10⁻²⁴)] / 2

             λ₁ = [-5 10⁻¹² ± 180 10⁻¹²] / 2

            λ₁ = 87.5 10⁻¹² m

             λ₂ = -92.5 10⁻¹² m

We take the positive wavelength

The wavelength of the photons is

            λ₁ = 87.5 10⁻¹² m

            λ₂ =  λ₁ + 0.13 10⁻⁹

             λ₂ = 87.5 10⁻¹² + 0.13 10⁻⁹

             λ₂ = 0.2175 10⁻⁹ m = 2.175 10⁻¹⁰ m

The energy after the first deceleration is

            E₂ = E₀ –E₁

            E₂ = E₀ –hc / λ₁

            E₂ = 3.2 10⁻¹⁵ - 6.63 10⁺³⁴ 3 10⁸ / 87.5 10⁻¹²

            E₂ = 3.2 10⁻¹⁵ - 2.27 10⁻¹⁵

             E₂ = 0.93 10⁻¹⁵ J

             E₂ = 0.93 10⁻¹⁵ J (1 eV / 1.6 10⁻¹⁹ J)

             E₂ = 5.8 10³ eV

You might be interested in
In an electricity demonstration at the Deutsches Museum in Munich, Germany, a person sits inside a metal sphere of radius 0.90 m
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

 E_interior = 0

Explanation:

As the sphere is metallic, the electrical charges are distributed on its surface, as far away as possible from each other.

If we apply Gauss's law, as the charge is on the surface, when drawing a spherical Gaussian surface, we see that there is no charge inside, therefore there is no electric field inside the metallic sphere.

          E_interior = 0

6 0
3 years ago
I am sitting on a train car traveling horizontally at a constant speed of 50 m/s. I throw a ball straight up into the air.
drek231 [11]

Answer:

Explanation:

I am sitting on a train car traveling horizontally at a constant speed of 50 m/s. I throw a ball straight up into the air. Before , the ball gets separated from my hand , both me the ball will be moving with velocity of 50 m /s in horizontal direction .

As soon as ball is separated from the hand , it acquires addition velocity in upward direction and acceleration in downward direction . This will give relative velocity to the ball with respect to me . So I will see the ball going in upward direction under  gravitational acceleration . It appears as if I am sitting at rest and ball is going in upward direction under deceleration . My motion at 50 m/s will have no effect on the motion of ball in upward direction , according to first law of Newton . It is so because ball too will be moving in forward direction with the same speed which will not be visible to me because I too am moving with the same speed.

If I  am  sitting at rest at home and I threw a ball straight up into the air , I will have the same experience of seeing ball going in similar way as described above.

8 0
3 years ago
An object that covers more distance in the same amount of time has a higher speed.
DiKsa [7]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is heavier, 1 m3 of steel or 1 m3 of aluminium?​
Strike441 [17]

Answer:

Steel is almost 2.9 times heavier the aluminium.

5 0
2 years ago
Please help me with this please <br><br> I’ll mark you Brainly
ivolga24 [154]
I think it is option (C).

If the answer is helpful then mark me as brainly.
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which element in Figure 2 is a transition metal? Which is a noble gas?
    6·1 answer
  • If the velocity of an object changes from 15 m/s to 50 m/s during a time interval of 4 s, what is the acceleration of the object
    13·1 answer
  • Name the two types of vaporization and explain the difference between them. Give one example of each. ​
    8·1 answer
  • Do you think it is alright for a girl to try to win a race for a bike ride explain your answers
    12·2 answers
  • A dog walks 12 meters to the west and then 16 meters back to the east
    9·2 answers
  • BRAINLIEST, PLEASE pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls pls plsl plsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
    13·1 answer
  • How can you cause a cart moving to the right at a constant speed to move to the left at a constant speed.
    6·1 answer
  • Is chocolate melting in your hand conduction, convection, or radiation?
    8·2 answers
  • How much work was done on a charge of 3.0 to move it through 12v electric potential difference
    15·2 answers
  • If the activity of a radionuclide decreases from 5,000 disintegrations per minute to 625 disintegrations per minute
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!