Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

13

Which explains how the ocean warms the air? A. The seawater absorbs heat from the sun and warms the air above it by convection.

B. The seawater absorbs heat from the sun and warms the air above it by conduction. C. The seawater absorbs heat from the sun and warms the air above it by radiation. D. The seawater absorbs heat from the sun and warms the air above it by insulation.

2 answers:

mr Goodwill [35]3 years ago

6 0

The right answer is c because it absorbs the heat then it pushes it away like radiation

riadik2000 [5.3K]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The right answer is c because it absorbs the heat then it pushes it away like radiation

Explanation:

You might be interested in

A charge is divided q1 and (q-q1)what will be the ratio of q/q1 so that force between the two parts placed at a given distance i

Arturiano [62]

Answer:

$q / q_{1} = 2$ , assuming that $q_{1}$ and $(q - q_{1})$ are point charges.

Explanation:

Let $k$ denote the coulomb constant. Let $r$ denote the distance between the two point charges. In this question, neither $k$ and $r$ depend on the value of $q_{1}$ .

By Coulomb's Law, the magnitude of electrostatic force between $q_{1}$ and $(q - q_{1})$ would be:

$\begin{aligned}F &= \frac{k\, q_{1}\, (q - q_{1})}{r^{2}} \\ &= \frac{k}{r^{2}}\, (q\, q_{1} - {q_{1}}^{2})\end{aligned}$ .

Find the first and second derivative of $F$ with respect to $q_{1}$ . (Note that $0 < q_{1} < q$ .)

First derivative:

$\begin{aligned}\frac{d}{d q_{1}}[F] &= \frac{d}{d q_{1}} \left[\frac{k}{r^{2}}\, (q\, q_{1} - {q_{1}}^{2})\right] \\ &= \frac{k}{r^{2}}\, \left[\frac{d}{d q_{1}} [q\, q_{1}] - \frac{d}{d q_{1}}[{q_{1}}^{2}]\right]\\ &= \frac{k}{r^{2}}\, (q - 2\, q_{1})\end{aligned}$ .

Second derivative:

$\begin{aligned}\frac{d^{2}}{{d q_{1}}^{2}}[F] &= \frac{d}{d q_{1}} \left[\frac{k}{r^{2}}\, (q - 2\, q_{1})\right] \\ &= \frac{(-2)\, k}{r^{2}}\end{aligned}$ .

The value of the coulomb constant $k$ is greater than $0$ . Thus, the value of the second derivative of $F$ with respect to $q_{1}$ would be negative for all real $r$ . $F\!$ would be convex over all $q_{1}$ .

By the convexity of $\! F$ with respect to $\! q_{1} \!$ , there would be a unique $q_{1}$ that globally maximizes $F$ . The first derivative of $F\!$ with respect to $q_{1}\!$ should be $0$ for that particular $\! q_{1}$ . In other words:

$\displaystyle \frac{k}{r^{2}}\, (q - 2\, q_{1}) = 0$ <em>.</em>

$2\, q_{1} = q$ .

$q_{1} = q / 2$ .

In other words, the force between the two point charges would be maximized when the charge is evenly split:

$\begin{aligned} \frac{q}{q_{1}} &= \frac{q}{q / 2} = 2\end{aligned}$ .

3 0

3 years ago

A person drives for 1.00 h at 10.0 km/h and 2.00 h at 20.0 km/h. What is their average speed, in SI units?

Veronika [31]

I believe it is b if i’m correct

6 0

3 years ago

Your image appears 3.0 m from a plane mirror. How far IS YOUR IMAGE IN<br> RELATION TO YOU?*

Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

Being a plane mirror the Image is formed 3 metres beyond the mirror . So total distance is 3+3 = 6metres

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A wire is joined to points X and Y in the circuit diagram shown. A diagram of a circuit with a power source on the left. Directl

Sidana [21]

The circuit change when the wire is added will see a short circuit occur and makes bulbs 1 and 2 turn off but keeps bulbs 3 and 4 lit. Option D. This is further explained below.

<h3>How does the circuit change when the wire is added?</h3>

Generally, Electronic circuits consist of a series of interconnected parts that form a closed loop through which electricity may flow.

In conclusion, If two wires are linked together, a short circuit will develop, cutting power to bulbs 1 and 2. But there is no impact on bulbs 3 and 4. There is no problem with bulbs 3 and 4.

Read more about circuit

brainly.com/question/21505732

#SPJ1

7 0

2 years ago

A uniform rod is set up so that it can rotate about a perpendicular axis at one of its ends. The length and mass of the rod are

igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

0.231 N

Explanation:

To get from rest to angular speed of 6.37 rad/s within 9.87s, the angular acceleration of the rod must be

$\alpha = \frac{\theta}{t} = \frac{6.37}{9.87} = 0.6454 rad/s^2$

If the rod is rotating about a perpendicular axis at one of its end, then it's momentum inertia must be:

$I = \frac{mL^2}{3} = \frac{1.27*0.847^2}{3} = 0.303kgm^2$

According to Newton 2nd law, the torque required to exert on this rod to achieve such angular acceleration is

$T = I\alpha = 0.303*0.6454 = 0.196 Nm$

So the force acting on the other end to generate this torque mush be:

$F = \frac{T}{L} = \frac{0.196}{0.847} = 0.231 N$

4 0

3 years ago