Answer:
time taken for one-half of the BrO⁻ ion to react is t= 27.45 secs
Explanation:
equation of reaction
3BrO⁻(aq) → BrO₃⁻(aq) + 2Br⁻(aq) (second order reaction)
given
the slope of the graph is 0.056M⁻¹s⁻¹ = k(constant)
initial concentration [A]₀ = 0.65M
for second order reaction,we can calculate the time taken for one-half of the BrO- ion to react using:
![\frac{1}{[A]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5BA%5D%7D)
=₀ ⁺ k × t
where initial concentration [A]₀ = 0.65M
[A] = [A]₀÷2 = 0.325M
= 
+ 0.056M⁻¹s⁻¹ × t
3.077= 1.54 + 0.056t
3.077-1.54=0.056t
1.537=0.056t
t= 27.45 secs
;
Explanation: Look at the scrrn shot and you can see what is on there or not. :)))))
Answer:
2.03 atm
Explanation:
Number of moles of He = 1g/4g/mol = 0.25 moles
Number of moles of F2 = 14.0g/38 g/mol = 0.37 moles
Number of moles of Ar=19.0g/40g/mol = 0.48 moles
Total number of moles = 0.25 + 0.37 + 0.48 = 1.1 moles
From;
PV=nRT
P= pressure of the gas mixture
V= volume of the gas mixture
n= total number of moles of the gas mixture
R= gas constant
T= temperature of the gas mixture
P= nRT/V
P= 1.1 × 0.082 × 293/13
P= 2.03 atm
Answer:
.000064565
Explanation:
H3O+=10^-pH
- Hope that helps! Please let me know if you need further explanation.
Answer:
Wave theory of light that states that visible light irrespective of its color, can cause the ejection of electrons when it strikes a metal.
Explanation:
Wave theory of light:
- If we go through wave theory of light, it clearly focuses that light is of actually wave nature not particle nature.
- The wave theory was based on the ideas of Hertz who discovered in 1887 that metallic surface can emit heat energy (electrons) when light hits the metal. If we increase the intensity of light, it will also increase the incident energy and ultimately increase the kinetic energy of electrons.
- Moreover, the frequency of light do not matters much, just a beam of light can eject the electrons from the metal.
Photoelectric effect:
On the other hand, Photoelectric effect can be considered only if we assume that light has particle like nature and not wave like nature.
- It also says that frequency of light matters alot in ejecting the electrons from the metals. If the frequency of light is less, it will not eject electrons from the metal surface even if it falls on metal for a very long time.
- It also says that maximum kinetic energy of the electrons (that are emitted) corresponds with the light frequency that caused the emission of electrons.
- The current of emitted electrons is directly proportional to the intensity of light that caused the electron emission.
We can see that the postulates of wave theory (like no.3) are just opposite to the postulates of photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect also explained the relationship between emitted electrons and light in a better way that was not described by wave theory. We can say that it is as advanced explanation of facts based on the classical theory of wave like nature of visible light.
