Societies have changed over time, and consequently, so has science. For example, during the first half of the 20th century, when the world was enmeshed in war, governments made funds available for scientists to pursue research with wartime applications — and so science progressed in that direction, unlocking the mysteries of nuclear energy. At other times, market forces have led to scientific advances. For example, modern corporations looking for income through medical treatment, drug production, and agriculture, have increasingly devoted resources to biotechnology research, yielding breakthroughs in genomic sequencing and genetic engineering. And on the flipside, modern foundations funded by the financial success of individuals may invest their money in ventures that they deem to be socially responsible, encouraging research on topics like renewable energy technologies. Science is not static; it changes over time, reflecting shifts in the larger societies in which it is embedded
Answer:
<u>Oxidation state of Mn = +4</u>
Explanation:
Atomic mass of Mn = 55g/mol
From Faraday's law of electrolysis,
Electrochemical equivalent = 
i.e Z =
=
= 0.0001424 g/C
But Equivalent weight, E = atomic mass ÷ valency = Z × 96,485
⇒
= 0.0001424 × 96,485
<u>∴ Valency of Mn = +4</u>
Explanation:
Scientist use trees a whole lot to look at climate of the past by examining tree rings.
These are layers of cambium in each successive years formed. They have an annual growth pattern and are known as tree rings.
Tree rings can be used to decipher the age of a tree.
- These three rings can be used to interpret climatic patterns.
- During a wet climate, the tree rings are more robust and bigger.
- In a dry climate, the rings are thinner.
- These alternating patterns can be used to decipher the climatic signatures in a tree.
- Sometimes, it is possible to evaluate some certain isotopes that are useful in climatic studies.
learn more:
Climate change brainly.com/question/7824762
#learnwithBrainly
The answer is B
Vaporization
Answer:
the concentration of the solution is 0.00906 M
Explanation:
Given the data in the question;
we know that from Nernst Equation;
E = E⁰ - ((0.0592/n) logQ)
now, E₀ for concentration cell is 0
n for this redox is 2
concentration of the unknown solution is x
so we substitute
0.045 = 0 - ( 0.0592 / 2)log( x/0.300 ))
0.045 = -0.0296log( x/0.300 )
divide both side by 0.0296
1.52 = -log( x/0.300 )
x/0.300 =
x/0.300 = 0.0301995
we cross multiply
x = 0.300 × 0.0301995
x = 0.00906 M
Therefore, the concentration of the solution is 0.00906 M