1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katen-ka-za [31]
4 years ago
9

A pin-supported, vertically-oriented 1-m long thin rod is struck by a pellet at m down from the pin at the top. The mass of the

pellet is and the mass of the rod is . The pellet has an initial velocty , and the thin rod is initially at rest. Matlab/Mathematica input: mp = 0.012; mr = 7; ry = 0.8 vpix = 260; vpiy = 350; What is the angular velocity of the rod immediately after being struck by the pellet, provided that the pellet gets lodged in the rod?
Physics
1 answer:
Natasha_Volkova [10]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

the angular velocity of the rod immediately after being struck by the pellet, provided that the pellet gets lodged in the rod is = 0.5036 k` rad/s

Explanation:

Using the conservation of momentum of approach.

From the question; the pellet is hitting at a distance of 0.4 m down from the point of rotation of the rod.

So, the angular momentum of the system just before the collision occurs  with respect to the axis of the rotation is expressed by the formula:

L_i ^ { ^  \to } = mp ( r_y } ^ { ^  \to }  * v_{pi}  ^ { ^  \to } )    ----- equation (1)

The position vector can now be :

x ^ { ^  \to } = - 0.4 \ j \ m

Also, given that :

v_{p,i}  ^ { ^  \to } = (280 \ i - 350 \  j)  \ m/s

Replacing the value into above equation (1); we have:

L_i ^ { ^  \to } =0.012 ((- \ 0.4 \  j) *(280 \ i - 350 \ j ))

L_i ^ { ^  \to } =0.012 * 112 \  k    (by using cross product )

L_i ^ { ^  \to } = 1.344 k` \  \  kg  m^2 s^{-1}

However; the moment of inertia of the rod about the axis of rotation is :

I_{rod} = \frac{1}{3}m_rl^2  \\ \\ I_{rod} = \frac{1}{3}*8*1^2 \\ \\ I_{rod} = \frac{8}{3} \ \  kg  \ m^2

Also, the moment of inertia of the pellet about the axis of rotation is:

I_{pellet} = m_pr_y^2 \\ \\ I_{pellet} = 0.012 *0.4^2  \\ \\ I_{pellet} = 1.92*10^{-3} kg . m^2

So, the moment of inertia of the rod +pellet system is:

I = I_{rod}+I_{pellet}

I =( \frac{8}{3}+1.92 *10^{-3} )kg. m^2

I = 2.6686 \  kg. m^2

The final angular momentum is :

L_f ^ {^ \to}  = I \omega { ^ {^ \to} } = 2.6686 \  \omega  ^ {^ \to}

The angular velocity of the rod \omega is determined by equating the angular momentum just before the collision with the final angular momentum (i.e after the collision).

So;

L_f ^ {^ \to} = L_i ^ { ^ \to}

2.6686 \omega ^ {^ \to} = 1.344 \ k ^ {^ \to}

\omega  ^ {^ \to} = \frac{1.344 \ k`}{2.6686}

= 0.5036 k` rad/s

Hence; the angular velocity of the rod immediately after being struck by the pellet, provided that the pellet gets lodged in the rod is = 0.5036 k` rad/s

You might be interested in
My brainly isn’t working. When i have a new notification, and I click on it, it takes me to a pop-up saying “Oops.. something’s
motikmotik

Answer:

If you remember your username and password when you set up brianly. Uninstall it and then reinstall then put your information in. Then if that dont work send them a message telling them what's going on

3 0
3 years ago
Geothermal energy is derived from the sun. True or False?
pashok25 [27]
<span>So we want to know is it true or false that geothermal energy is derived from the Sun. Geothermal energy is heat energy that is stored in the Earth. Solar energy is energy that we get by collecting sunlight via solar collectors and turning it into electrical energy. So the answer is FALSE. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Calculate the ph of the solution that results following addition of 24 ml of 1.0 mnaoh to 60 ml of 1.0 mnh4cl.
Lostsunrise [7]

The pH of the solution is 0.37.

<h3>What is the pH of the solution?</h3>

We can write the equation of the reaction as;

NH4Cl (aq) + NaOH (aq) ------- > NH3 (aq) + H2O (l) + NaCl (aq)

Number of moles of NaOH= 24/1000 * 1 = 0.024 moles

Number of moles of NH4Cl= 60/1000 * 1  = 0.060 moles

Given that the reaction is 1:1, the limiting reactant is NaOH

Number of moles of NH4Cl left over = 0.060 - 0.024 = 0.036 moles

Concentration of left  over NH4Cl = 0.036 moles/(24 + 60)/1000

= 0.43 moles

pH = -log(0.43)

pH = 0.37

Learn more about pH:brainly.com/question/15289741

#SPJ1

4 0
2 years ago
Does the moon make its own light?
Stels [109]

Answer:

no it gets it form the sun

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In general, court in the United States have repeatedly struck down efforts to include creationism or intelligent design in publi
OverLord2011 [107]
Because they are not supported by the results of any legitimate investigation
that's conducted in accordance with the Scientific Method. 

You may say: 
"Well then, teach both lines of reasoning,
and let each student decide for himself." 

This is suggested by the same people who aren't ready to let their
fourth-grader choose his own clothing, dinner menu, or school.
And it sounds reasonable to a vast mass of citizens who have decided
for them selves that the jury is still out on climate change.

What I'm saying is this:

-- The Scientific Method is a METHOD of investigation that's designed
and developed to remove the effects of human prejudice from the
collection and evaluation of evidence, and to be able to tell bogus
conclusions apart from true ones.  It's the most reliable way we have
of asking and answering questions about the natural world.

-- Some questions CAN'T be studied with the Scientific Method,
because experiments generally can't be constructed.  These include
matters of religion and faith.  Nobody can flatly state that those are
right or wrong.  We have no reliable way to say, either way. 
The only way to decide is . . . faith.   

-- It is illegitimate to take the answer to a question of faith that can't be
derived scientifically, and a scientifically derived conclusion, set them
down next to each other on the same table, and pretend that they can be
compared.

-- When you put them next to each other, say that they're equivalent,
and tell people "go ahead and choose one or the other", the situation
is bogus, the comparison is dishonest, and people who are untrained
or uneducated or immature are not qualified to "choose".

That's why.

This is my opinion.  I could be wrong.

Personally, I happen to be a believer.  But I cannot prove anything I believe
to anyone else ... not with rational argument, and not with evidence.  Those are
elements of the scientific method.  They're not applicable, and they don't work,
in matters of faith.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Masses A and B rest on very light pistons that enclose a fluid.There is no friction between the pistons and the cylinders they f
    11·1 answer
  • What is an apparent change in the frequency of sound or light waves known as?
    13·2 answers
  • Differences Between light year and astronomical unit in two points .
    11·1 answer
  • Over a short interval the coordinate of a car in the meters isgiven by x(t) = 27t - 4.0 t3 where time t is in seconds,at the end
    11·1 answer
  • Heather and Matthew walk with an average velocity of 0.98 m/s eastward. If it takes them 34 min to walk to the store, what is th
    5·1 answer
  • Concept Simulation 2.3 provides some background for this problem. A ball is thrown vertically upward, which is the positive dire
    14·1 answer
  • Atmospheric pressure is greater at the base of a mountain than at
    6·1 answer
  • HELP ME ILL MARK YOU THE BRAINLIEST
    10·2 answers
  • A 5 kg object moving to the right at 4 m/s collides inelastically with a 5 kg object
    12·1 answer
  • Which moon shows evidence of rainfall and erosion by some liquid substance?.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!