Stoichiometry time! Remember to look at the equation for your molar ratios in other problems.
31.75 g Cu | 1 mol Cu | 2 mol Ag | 107.9 g Ag 6851.65
⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻ → ⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻⁻ = 107.9 g Ag
∅ | 63.5 g Cu | 1 mol Cu | 1 mol Ag 63.5
There's also a shorter way to do this: Notice the molar ratio from Cu to Ag, which is 1:2. When you plug in 31.75 into your molar mass for Cu, it equals 1/2 mol. That also means that you have 1 mol Ag because of the ratio, qhich you can then plug into your molar mass, getting 107.9 as well.
Answer:
CH4 + 2O2 → CO2 + 2H2O
Explanation:
This is all i could come up with im sorry.
Proton number = the atomic number (which is the smaller number
neutron number = the mass number (the bigger number) - the atomic number
number of electrons = the atomic number - the charge (it depends on the element but group 1 is +1 group 2 is +2 group 3 is +3 group five is -3 group six is -2 group seven is -1
i would solve the whole thing but its unclear hope this helps tho
Yes, it is the power of material evidence that wins.
- Evidence used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis is known as material evidence.
- Evidence is also used by scientists in various contexts, such as when they apply ideas to real-world issues.
- Whether a person accepts the data as proof depends on their presumptions or views regarding how observations relate to a theory.
- A creative hypothesis is developed by a scientist and may be refuted by testing it against evidence or established truths.
- Evidence can refute a hypothesis by demonstrating facts that are at odds with it. In contrast, the presence of evidence does not preclude the possibility of future, undiscovered evidence supporting the idea.
Therefore, it is the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that
proves an answer in Science.
Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ9
