1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anton [14]
3 years ago
13

Which describes the Grand Canyon as it will be one million years from today? Select the two correct answers.(1 point)

Chemistry
2 answers:
olga55 [171]3 years ago
7 0
Answer;

I think it will become shallower and narrower.

Explanation;

This is because today, the Grand Canyon is deep and wide, we are talking about how it was one million years ago, which would look noting like this today. Little piece of rock has started to fall off of the sides of the Grand Canyon so it looks how it looks today.

(Sorry, I kinda suck at explaining, also I’m not 100% this is correct but I’m pretty sure)
goldenfox [79]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

I think it's either a and b or b and c.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
A chemistry student must write down in her lab notebook the concentration of a solution of potassium chloride. The concentration
DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

3.65 g / ml correct to 3 sig. fig.

Explanation:

The computation of the concentration required is shown below:

As we know that

[A] = mass of solute ÷ volume of solution

Before that first find the mass of solute

Given that

Initial weight = 5.55g

And,

Final weight = 92.7 g

So,

Mass of KCl is

= 92.7 - 5.55

= 87.15 g ~ 87.2 g

Now the KCi is fully dissolved, so the volume is 23.9 ml

So,  concentration is

= 87.2 g ÷ 23.9 ml

= 3.65 g / ml correct to 3 sig. fig.

6 0
3 years ago
A mixture of gases with a pressure of 800.0 mm hg contains 60% nitrogen and 40% oxygen by volume. what is the partial pressure o
klasskru [66]
Hello!

<span>We have the following statement data:
</span>
Data:
P_{Total} = 800 mmHg
P\% N_{2} = 60\%
P\% O_{2} = 40\%
P_{partial} = ? (mmHg)

<span>As the percentage is the mole fraction multiplied by 100:

</span>P =  X_{ O_{2} }*100

<span>The mole fraction will be the percentage divided by 100, thus:
</span><span>What is the partial pressure of oxygen in this mixture? 
</span>
X_{ O_{2} }  =  \frac{P}{100}
X_{ O_{2}} =  \frac{40}{100}
\boxed{X_{ O_{2}} = 0.4}


<span>To calculate the partial pressure of the oxygen gas, it is enough to use the formula that involves the pressures (total and partial) and the fraction in quantity of matter:
</span>
In relation to O_{2} :

\frac{P O_{2} }{P_{total}} = X_O_{2}
\frac{P O_{2} }{800} = 0.4
P_O_{2} = 0.4*800
\boxed{\boxed{P_O_{2} = 320\:mmHg}}\end{array}}\qquad\quad\checkmark
<span>
Answer:
</span><span>b. 320.0 mm hg </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Calculate the theoretical yield of ammonia produced by the reaction of 100g of H2 gas and 200g of N2 gas
ipn [44]
To get the theoretical yield of ammonia NH3:
first, we should have the balanced equation of the reaction:
3H2(g) + N2(g) → 2NH3(g)
Second, we start to convert mass to moles
moles of N2 = N2 mass / N2 molar mass
                     = 200 / 28 = 7.14 moles
third, we start to compare the molar ratio from the balanced equation between N2 & NH3 we will find that N2: NH3 = 1:2 so when we use every mole of N2 we will get 2 times of that mole of NH3 so,
moles of NH3 = 7.14 * 2 = 14.28 moles 
finally, we convert the moles of NH3 to mass again to get the mass of ammonia:
mass of NH3 = no.moles * molar mass of ammonia
                      = 14.28 * 17 = 242.76 g
6 0
3 years ago
2) 183 cg =<br> kg<br> 5<br> .00183 kg<br> 0.0183 kg<br> .183 kg<br> 3) 0.25 kg =<br> g
OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

183 cg = 0.00183 kg

0.25 kg = 250 g

Explanation:

Use conversion factors. 1kg is equal to 1 x 10^5 cg (100000) and 1 kg is equal to 1 x 10^3 grams (1000 grams).

5 0
3 years ago
Explain why scientists find the particulate matter of theory useful
BARSIC [14]

This idea has historical significance. The ancient Greek philosopher Democritus (born 460 BCE), who held that everything is composed of small particles moving in empty space, is credited with developing the first hypothesis we have about the microscopic universe. He had some concrete proof for this, such the fact that items like a new loaf of bread or a rose may give off a scent even when they are far from the source. Being a materialist, he thought that these odors originated from actual material particles released by the bread or the rose, rather than being purely a type of magic. He reasoned that these particles must float through the air, with some of them maybe landing in your nose where you can smell them immediately. This still makes sense in modern times. But many of us now have quite different perspectives on these "particles."

Thank you,

Eddie

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do minor parties have difficulty succeeding in the United States electoral system? A. tend to focus on only a single issue B
    5·1 answer
  • Find the density of a sample that has a volume of 36.5L and a mass of 10.0kg
    6·1 answer
  • Chlorine + lithium iodide<br> →
    14·1 answer
  • 5) How do you describe a person who likes<br>inventing stories?<br>Plz Help ;_; :v​
    9·1 answer
  • Determine the empirical formula for c6n4o10
    11·1 answer
  • Determine the latitude and longitude of the location A
    8·1 answer
  • How to write a lap conclusion
    7·1 answer
  • What is the abbreviation for water?
    8·2 answers
  • How many kilograms are in 125 pounds
    7·1 answer
  • When two balls collide, the momentum of the balls after the collision is explained by?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!