1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pantera1 [17]
3 years ago
9

What do the elements in each pair have in common?

Chemistry
1 answer:
disa [49]3 years ago
7 0

The elements in each pair have in common it that they are metaloids

You might be interested in
How are rare earth elements like neodymiun important to our technological world?
kherson [118]
Im assuming, if you find rare earth elements, it is important to the technological world bc you can make more products more better, and even invent new and more modern things.
7 0
2 years ago
The orbital radius of Venus is 0.72 AU. What is this distance in kilometers? (One AU is about 150 million kilometers.)
Evgen [1.6K]
<span>The answer is D) 108 million kilometers. To solve this problem, you must perform a simple unit conversion calculation. 1 AU = 150,000,000 km is the conversion factor. Take the radius of Venus, .72 AU, and multiply it by 150,000,000 km/1 AU. You flip the conversion factor so that the units of the original distance in the numerator cancel the units in the denominator of the conversion factor. completing the calculation gives you 108,000,000 km</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Which is the best example of a new substance forming?
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

lighting a match is the answer.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many nitrogen atoms are represented in 2Ca(NO3)2?
arsen [322]

Explanation:

there is 2 nitrogen but if you mean nitrate is 6

4 0
3 years ago
Consider the following equilibrium: 2SO^2(g) + O2(9) = 2 SO3^(g)
saul85 [17]

Answer:

At equilibrium, the forward and backward reaction rates are equal.

The forward reaction rate would decrease if \rm O_2 is removed from the mixture. The reason is that collisions between \rm SO_2 molecules and \rm O_2\! molecules would become less frequent.

The reaction would not be at equilibrium for a while after \rm O_2 was taken out of the mixture.

Explanation:

<h3>Equilibrium</h3>

Neither the forward reaction nor the backward reaction would stop when this reversible reaction is at an equilibrium. Rather, the rate of these two reactions would become equal.

Whenever the forward reaction adds one mole of \rm SO_3\, (g) to the system, the backward reaction would have broken down the same amount of \rm SO_3\, (g)\!. So is the case for \rm SO_2\, (g) and \rm O_2\, (g).

Therefore, the concentration of each species would stay the same. There would be no macroscopic change to the mixture when it is at an an equilibrium.

<h3>Collision Theory</h3>

In the collision theory, an elementary reaction between two reactants particles takes place whenever two reactant particles collide with the correct orientation and a sufficient amount of energy.

Assume that \rm SO_2\, (g) and \rm O_2\, (g) molecules are the two particles that collide in the forward reaction. Because the collision has to be sufficiently energetic to yield \rm SO_3\, (g), only a fraction of the reactions will be fruitful.

Assume that \rm O_2\, (g) molecules were taken out while keeping the temperature of the mixture stays unchanged. The likelihood that a collision would be fruitful should stay mostly the same.

Because fewer \!\rm O_2\, (g) molecules would be present in the mixture, there would be fewer collisions (fruitful or not) between \rm SO_2\, (g) and \rm O_2\, (g)\! molecules in unit time. Even if the percentage of fruitful collisions stays the same, there would fewer fruitful collisions in unit time. It would thus appear that the forward reaction has become slower.

<h3>Equilibrium after Change</h3>

The backward reaction rate is likely going to stay the same right after \rm O_2\, (g) was taken out of the mixture without changing the temperature or pressure.

The forward and backward reaction rates used to be the same. However, right after the change, the forward reaction would become slower while the backward reaction would proceed at the same rate. Thus, the forward reaction would become slower than the backward reaction in response to the change.

Therefore, this reaction would not be at equilibrium immediately after the change.

As more and more \rm SO_3\, (g) gets converted to \rm SO_2\, (g) and \rm O_2\, (g), the backward reaction would slow down while the forward reaction would pick up speed. The mixture would once again achieve equilibrium when the two reaction rates become equal again.

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A moving company is called into a building and asked to relocate 520 bricks to a location 15 meters above the ground. If each br
    13·2 answers
  • Describes something that is quantized
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement defines the temperature of a sample of matter?
    6·1 answer
  • Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) can be produced by
    8·1 answer
  • What is the ph of a solution with a hydroxide ion concentration of 10–10m?
    14·1 answer
  • These are the photos for part A
    12·1 answer
  • DO NOT TROLL AND ANSWER WITHOUT THE CORRECT ANSWER! I EXPECT THE CORRECT ANSWER NOT A TROLL SO IF YOU DONT HAVE THE ANSWER DO NO
    10·1 answer
  • Burning something is always a chemical change that requires a fuel and
    14·2 answers
  • 1. A 250g chunk of metal is heated with 400 joules of energy and the temperature goes from 20 °C to 25°C. What is its specific h
    8·1 answer
  • What can you conclude about the ad disease from the cd4-deficient (cd4-ko) and cd8-deficient (cd-ko) mice?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!