F(of spring)=230x=ma=3.5(5)=17.5=230x; x=0.07m.
Explanation:
sbsbbsbshdi she sgebsbwhwjge hsshhdhsshshsuus she's used ydhdyuyddhdhdy hehehe due susshsuhdhdhd ffujfufudhdndndjd d
Answer:
The change in kinetic energy (KE) of the car is more in the second case.
Explanation:
Let the mass of the car = m
initial velocity of the first case, u = 22 km/h = 6.11 m/s
final velocity of the first case, v = 32 km/h = 8.89 m/s
change in kinetic energy (K.E) = ¹/₂m(v² - u²)
ΔK.E = ¹/₂m(8.89² - 6.11²)
= 20.85m J
initial velocity of the second case, u = 32 km/h = 8.89 m/s
final velocity of the second case, v = 42 km/h = 11.67 m/s
change in kinetic energy (K.E) = ¹/₂m(v² - u²)
ΔK.E = ¹/₂m(11.67² - 8.89²)
= 28.58m J
The change in kinetic energy (KE) of the car is more in the second case.
Gauss law states that the electric flux through any closed
surface is proportional to the net electric charge inside the surface. This is
expressed mathematically in the form of:
Φ = Q / εo
Where,
Φ = the electric flux = unknown (which we have to find for)
Q = the net electric charge = 5.0 µC = 5 E-6 C
εo = the permittivity of free space = a constant value =
8.85 E-12 C^2 / N m^2
Plugging in the values
into the equation will result in:
Φ = 5 E-6
C / (8.85 E-12 C^2 / N m^2)
Φ = 564,971.75 Wb = <span>5.6 x
10^5 Wb </span>
Answer:
Savage is the answer
Explanation: The savage people guess like me