All categories

2 years ago

Match each scientist with the contribution he made to the arrangement of elements in the periodic table

Physics

2 answers:

Vera_Pavlovna [14]2 years ago

8 0

Answer: go across each one of them. Took the test

Explanation:

Sergeeva-Olga [200]2 years ago

6 0

Dmitri Mendeleev- arranged elements according to their

atomic mass

Johann Wolfgang Dobereiner-created groups of three elements,

each based on similar properties

John Newlands-used patterns to predict undiscovered

elements

Antoine Lavoisier-divided elements into four categories

Explanation:

The periodic table or the table depicting the arrangement of various elements has a long history. Several of the scientist starting from Lavoisier to Mendeleev contributed to the table in their might. The present table has been an evolution of the previous tables over their shortcomings.

Some of the notable contributions include-

Mendeleev- Mendeleev arranged the elements in order of atomic mass rather than atomic mass. Through this, he also discovered new elements.

Newlands- He formulated the Newland law of octaves similar to musical notation.

Lavoisier- Lavoisier divided the elements into various categories and also defined elements.

Dobereiner- He formulated the triad law which encapsulated that certain group of elements showed similar properties, hence can be grouped together.

You might be interested in

I don't know how to figure it out

drek231 [11]

Nice couch lol
and aluminum I think

4 0

3 years ago

Two boats start together and race across a 48-km-wide lake and back. Boat A goes across at 48 km/h and returns at 48 km/h. Boat

nika2105 [10]

Answer:

Part 1)

Boat A will win the race

Part 2)

Boat A will win the race by 48 km as the 2nd boat will reach the other end while boat A will just touches the finish line

Part 3)

average velocity must be zero

Explanation:

As we know that the distance moved by the boat is given as

$d = 48 km$

now the time taken by the boat to move to and fro is given as

$t = \frac{d}{v}$

$t = \frac{48 + 48}{48}$

$t = 2 hrs$

Time taken by Boat B to cover the distance

$t = \frac{48}{24} + \frac{48}{72}$

$t = 2.66 h$

Part 1)

Boat A will win the race

Part 2)

Boat A will win the race by 48 km as the 2nd boat will reach the other end while boat A will just touches the finish line

Part 3)

Since the displacement of Boat A is zero

so average velocity must be zero

3 0

3 years ago

NASA has asked your team of rocket scientists about the feasibility of a new satellite launcher that will save rocket fuel. NASA

kkurt [141]

Answer:

The answer is " $q=0.0945\,C$ ".

Explanation:

Its minimum velocity energy is provided whenever the satellite(charge 4 q) becomes 15 m far below the square center generated by the electrode (charge q).

$U_i=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \times \frac{4\times4q^2}{\sqrt{(15)^2+(5/\sqrt2)^2}}$

It's ultimate energy capacity whenever the satellite is now in the middle of the electric squares:

$U_f=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\ \times \frac{4\times4q^2}{( \frac{5}{\sqrt{2}})}$

Potential energy shifts:

$= U_f -U_i \\\\ =\frac{16q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\left ( \frac{\sqrt2}{5}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{(15)^2+( \frac{5}{\sqrt{2})^2)}}\right ) \\\\ =\frac{16q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\left ( \frac{\sqrt2}{5}-\frac{1}{ 15 +( \frac{5}{2})}}\right )\\\\ =\frac{16q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\left ( \frac{\sqrt2}{5}-\frac{1}{ (\frac{30+5}{2})}}\right )\\\\$

$=\frac{16q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\left ( \frac{\sqrt2}{5}-\frac{1}{ (\frac{35}{2})}}\right )\\\\=\frac{16q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\left ( \frac{\sqrt2}{5}-\frac{1}{17.5}}\right )\\\\ =\frac{16q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\left ( \frac{ 24.74- 5 }{87.5}}\right )\\\\ =\frac{16q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\left ( \frac{ 19.74- 5 }{87.5}}\right )\\\\ =\frac{4q^2}{\pi\epsilon_0}\left ( 0.2256 }\right )\\\\= \frac{0.28 \times q^2}{ \epsilon_0}\\\\=q^2\times31.35 \times10^9\,J$

Now that's the energy necessary to lift a satellite of 100 kg to 300 km across the surface of the earth.

$=\frac{GMm}{R}-\frac{GMm}{R+h} \\\\=(6.67\times10^{-11}\times6.0\times10^{24}\times100)\left(\frac{1}{6400\times1000}-\frac{1}{6700\times1000} \right ) \\\\ =(6.67\times10^{-11}\times6.0\times10^{26})\left(\frac{1}{64\times10^{5}}-\frac{1}{67\times10^{5}} \right ) \\\\=(6.67\times6.0\times10^{15})\left(\frac{67 \times 10^{5} - 64 \times 10^{5} }{ 4,228 \times10^{5}} \right ) \\\\$

$=( 40.02\times10^{15})\left(\frac{3 \times 10^{5}}{ 4,228 \times10^{5}} \right ) \\\\ =40.02 \times10^{15} \times 0.0007 \\\\$

$\\\\ =0.02799\times10^{10}\,J \\\\= q^2\times31.35\times10^{9} \\\\ =0.02799\times10^{10} \\\\q=0.0945\,C$

This satellite is transmitted by it system at a height of 300 km and not in orbit, any other mechanism is required to bring the satellite into space.

6 0

2 years ago

Which types of numbers does scientific notation best describe?

Travka [436]

The correct answer is
c) very small and very large

Let's see this with a few examples:
1) if we have a very small number, such as
 $0.0000000001$
we see that we can write it easily by using the scientific notation:
 $1\cdot 10^{-10}$
2) Similarly, if we have a very large number:
 $10000000000$
we see that we can write it easily by using again the scientific notation:
 $1 \cdot 10^{10}$

4 0

2 years ago

( Pennfoster plz help )

Mnenie [13.5K]

I would say C i'm not 100% sure

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers