The force that holds the gases in the sun. The force that causes a ball you throw in the air to come down again
Becuse your weighting with chalk that has pigment
(a) 0.448
The gravitational potential energy of a satellite in orbit is given by:

where
G is the gravitational constant
M is the Earth's mass
m is the satellite's mass
r is the distance of the satellite from the Earth's centre, which is sum of the Earth's radius (R) and the altitude of the satellite (h):
r = R + h
We can therefore write the ratio between the potentially energy of satellite B to that of satellite A as

and so, substituting:

We find

(b) 0.448
The kinetic energy of a satellite in orbit around the Earth is given by

So, the ratio between the two kinetic energies is

Which is exactly identical to the ratio of the potential energies. Therefore, this ratio is also equal to 0.448.
(c) B
The total energy of a satellite is given by the sum of the potential energy and the kinetic energy:

For satellite A, we have

For satellite B, we have

So, satellite B has the greater total energy (since the energy is negative).
(d) 
The difference between the energy of the two satellites is:

The answer to the question is A
Nuclear fusion in the core tries to blow the star apart. Gravity holds it together. Whoever designed that system really knew what he was doing. I'm kinda grateful to him.