I believe the correct response would be A. The cumulative nature of science. How experimental evidence and ideas made by many scientists have accumulated and or built up to have a more understandable and or clear view of a particular scientific topic, and or principle.
The molar concentration will be greater than 0.01 M 
.
Since more of the compound was measured out than what was calculated, you can think of the solution as being 'stronger' than what it was calculated to be. Since a 'stronger' concentration results in a number that is higher, the molarity of this solution is going to be greater than 0.01 M.
Answer:
Your answer would be C.
Explanation:
Gamma radiation, unlike alpha or beta, does not consist of any particles, instead consisting of a photon of energy being emitted from an unstable nucleus. Having no mass or charge, gamma radiation can travel much farther through air than alpha or beta, losing (on average) half its energy for every 500 feet.
Answer:
0.414 mole (3 sig. figs.)
Explanation:
Given grams, moles = mass/formula weight
moles in 18.2g CO₂(g) = 18.2g/44g/mole = 0.413636364 mole (calc. ans.)
≅ 0.414 mole (3 sig. figs.)
