1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nady [450]
3 years ago
10

A metal rod A and a metal sphere B, on insulating stands, touch each other. They are originally neutral. A positively charged ro

d is brought near (but not touching) the far end of A. While the charged rod is still close, A and B are separated. The charged rod is then withdrawn. Is the sphere then positively charged, negatively charged, or neutral?
Physics
1 answer:
ryzh [129]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The sphere is positively charged

Explanation:

This is because when the positively charged rod is brought near the metal rod A, the electrons in metal rod A and sphere B are attracted towards it into metal rod A while the positive charges in the are repelled into sphere B. So, when the charged rod is withdrawn, and metal rod A and sphere B are separated, metal rod A is now negatively charged, but sphere B is positively charged.

So, sphere B is positively charged.

You might be interested in
Which statement best explains the difference between velocity and speed?
aniked [119]

Answer by mimiwhatsup: B) Velocity is a vector and requires a direction to completely describe it.

Velocity is the speed and direction of an object in motion.



8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You are removing branches from your roof after a big storm. You throw a branch horizontally from your roof, which is a height 3.
mart [117]

Answer:

The initial velocity in the x-direction with which the branch was thrown is approximately 10.224 m/s

Explanation:

The given parameters of the motion of the branch are;

The height from which the branch is thrown = 3.00 m

The horizontal distance the branch lands from where it was thrown, x = 8.00 m

The direction in which the branch is thrown = Horizontally

Therefore, the initial vertical velocity of the branch, u_y = 0 m/s

The time it takes an object in free fall (zero initial downward vertical velocity) to reach the ground is given as follows;

s = u_y·t + 1/2·g·t²

Where;

u_y = 0 m/s

s = The initial height of the object = 3.00 m

g = The acceleration due to gravity = 9.8 m/s²

∴ s = 0·t + 1/2·g·t² = 0 × t + 1/2·g·t² = 1/2·g·t²

t = √(2·s/g) = √(2 × 3/9.8) = (√30)/7 ≈ 0.78246

The horizontal distance covered before the branch touches the ground, x = 8.00 m

Therefore, the initial velocity in the horizontal, x-direction with which the branch was thrown, 'uₓ', is given as follows;

uₓ = x/t = 8.00 m/((√30)/7 s)

Using a graphing calculator, we get;

uₓ = 8.00 m/((√30)/7 s) = (28/15)·√30 m/s ≈ 10.224 m/s

The initial velocity in the horizontal, x-direction with which the branch was thrown, uₓ ≈ 10.224 m/s.

3 0
3 years ago
Which describes how light travels?
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

the Answer Would be D

Explanation:

From what I know light travels 300,000 km/second , travels at fast speeds and travels in a straight line

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In an HVAC system, the purpose of pneumatics is to serve as A. a controller B. conditional air flow C. an energy source D. a sou
Naya [18.7K]

Answer: <u><em>A</em></u>

Explanation:

A pneumatic control system uses compressed air as a method of control for HVAC systems. ... Each senor responds to changes in temperature, humidity, and static pressure as examples, to provide feedback in a control loop to open or close the actuator to meet the control set point.

3 0
3 years ago
PLZ! PLZ! PLZ! HELP! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! Scientific Claim Engaging in scientific argument is a critical piece to the applicati
Nastasia [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

1The study of science and engineering should produce a sense of the process of argument necessary for advancing and defending a new idea or an explanation of a phenomenon and the norms for conducting such arguments. In that spirit, students should argue for the explanations they construct, defend their interpretations of the associated data, and advocate for the designs they propose. (NRC Framework, 2012, p. 73)

Argumentation is a process for reaching agreements about explanations and design solutions. In science, reasoning and argument based on evidence are essential in identifying the best explanation for a natural phenomenon. In engineering, reasoning and argument are needed to identify the best solution to a design problem. Student engagement in scientific argumentation is critical if students are to understand the culture in which scientists live, and how to apply science and engineering for the benefit of society. As such, argument is a process based on evidence and reasoning that leads to explanations acceptable by the scientific community and design solutions acceptable by the engineering community.

Argument in science goes beyond reaching agreements in explanations and design solutions. Whether investigating a phenomenon, testing a design, or constructing a model to provide a mechanism for an explanation, students are expected to use argumentation to listen to, compare, and evaluate competing ideas and methods based on their merits. Scientists and engineers engage in argumentation when investigating a phenomenon, testing a design solution, resolving questions about measurements, building data models, and using evidence to evaluate claims.

Compare and critique two arguments on the same topic and analyze whether they emphasize similar or different evidence and/or interpretations of facts.

Respectfully provide and receive critiques about one’s explanations, procedures, models and questions by citing relevant evidence and posing and responding to questions that elicit pertinent elaboration and detail.

Construct, use, and/or present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support or refute an explanation or a model for a phenomenon or a solution to a problem.

Make an oral or written argument that supports or refutes the advertised performance of a device, process, or system, based on empirical evidence concerning whether or not the technology meets relevant criteria and constraints.

Evaluate competing design solutions based on jointly developed and agreed-upon design criteria.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the bottom of the refrigerator called?
    10·1 answer
  • Many household products we consider necessary today such as AM and FM radios, televisions, wireless networks, cordless and cellu
    14·2 answers
  • Nitroglycerine decomposes violently according to the unbalanced chemical equation below. How many total moles of gases are produ
    8·1 answer
  • A projectile is launched into the air with an initial speed of 40 m/s and a launch angle of 20° above the horizontal. The projec
    7·1 answer
  • A soccer ball with mass 0.420 kg is initially moving with speed 2.00 m/s. A soccer player kicks the ball, exerting a constant fo
    7·1 answer
  • Calculate the acceleration of an object slowing from 9.8 m/s to 6.4 m/s over the course of 17s
    11·1 answer
  • What is the frequency of microwaves of wavelength 3 cm?
    11·1 answer
  • The Moon is responsible for what % of the tides that we experience?
    14·1 answer
  • Carbon-14 is used to determine the time an organism was living. The amount of carbon-14 an organism has is constant with the atm
    7·2 answers
  • The photograph shows a kettle made of the element copper. Which statement describes a chemical property of copper?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!