1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cricket20 [7]
3 years ago
10

11. A man lifts a weight of 300 N through a

Physics
1 answer:
satela [25.4K]3 years ago
7 0

Explanation:

Weight=force=300N

height=2m

time=6seconds

power=?

now,

power (p)=f×h÷t

power=300×2÷6

power=100w

therefore,A man develops 100 watt power in 6 seconds.

You might be interested in
Which segments show changes of state that absorb heat? Check all that apply.
Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

B-C

D-E

Explanation:

Trust

3 0
3 years ago
The long-term effect of temperature on the polar ice is not fully understood by science. True False
Reika [66]
I suggest the answer is True!!!! 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Pentium 4 Prescott processor, released in 2004, had a clock rate of 3.6 GHz and voltage of 1.25 V. Assume that, on average,
3241004551 [841]

Answer:

For Pentium 4 Prescott:

% of Static Power = 10

For core i5 Ivy Bridge:

% of Static Power = 43

Given Information:

Static Power of P4 = 10 W

Dynamic Power of P4 = 90 W

Static Power of i5 = 30 W

Dynamic Power of i5 = 40 W

Required Information:

% of static power w.r.t total power dissipation = ?

Explanation:

For Pentium 4 Prescott:

% of static power = static power/total power * 100

% of static power = 10/(10 + 90) * 100

% of static power = 10/(100) * 100

% of static power = 10

For core i5 Ivy Bridge:

% of static power = static power/total power * 100

% of static power = 30/(30 + 40) * 100

% of static power = 30/(70) * 100

% of static power = 43 (rounded to nearest whole integer)

5 0
3 years ago
1 HELP PLEASE I'LL GIVE BRAINLIST AND POINTS!!!
mixas84 [53]

Explanation:

The question of analog vs. digital audio is one of the more hotly debated questions in the world of music, film and media today. Does digital sound better? Does analog sound better? Is there even a noticeable difference?

It’s impossible to understand the difference completely without understanding what distinguishes analog audio from digital audio. A full discussion of these terms is best left to your curriculum and discussions with your mentor in the studio. For now, though, here’s a brief explanation of what these two words mean, and the differences between them.

Analog refers to a continuously changing representation of a continuously variable quantity. Digital, however, refers to representing these variable quantities in terms of actual numbers, or digits. The last two sentences seem a bit complex, but let’s try to simplify them with an example. If you consider the numbers 1 and 2 on a number line, there are actually an infinite number of points between 1 and 2. This is what analog represents—the infinite number of possibilities between 1 and 2. Digital, on the other hand, only looks at certain number of fixed points along the line between 1 and 2 (for example, 1 ¼, 1 ½, 1 ¾, and 2).

Can you see the difference? Digital takes a few “snapshots” of the number line, while analog takes the whole line into account.

As another example, think of analog vs. digital as the difference between seeing something in real life and watching it on film. When we see something happen in real life, there are no “spaces” between what we see, so we’re watching it happen in analog. Film, however, is actually a series of still photographs that are taken in rapid-fire intervals, and when we see them in succession, it tricks our minds into thinking we’re seeing a continuous flow of movement. So in a manner of speaking, when we watch the event happen on film, we’re watching it digitally, because we’re watching increments of the event, rather than the whole thing in fluid motion. (Not to be confused with digital video vs. film, which is another discussion completely!)

Let’s bring this idea into audio, music, and the studio. Sound occurs naturally in analog–that is to say, sound occurs in a continuous set of waves that we hear with the human ear. (Think of it as a “wavy” line with an infinite number of points along it.) When we capture that sound in a way that represents all the possible frequencies, we’re recording in analog; when we use computers to translate the sound into a series of numbers that approximate what we’re hearing, we’re recording in digital.

Thus, a purely analog recording would be something that was recorded on tape and produced using manual equipment to mix, master and press into a vinyl LP. A purely digital recording would be recorded on a computer program such as Pro Tools, mixed, mastered and produced digitally, and eventually burned onto a CD as an MP3 or audio file.

The most ironic aspect of the debate about digital vs. analog recording is that nowadays a lot of music is a combination of the two.  For example, you might record a song onto analog tape, but mix and master it digitally, or release it on the Internet as an MP3.

So what’s the difference in quality between analog and digital? The idea between digital recording is that our ears and brains technically can’t determine the spaces between the digital values, just like our brains interpret film as continuous motion. However, to many people, analog sound tends to be warmer, has more texture and is thought to capture a truer representation of the actual sound. Digital is felt to be somewhat cold, technical and perhaps lacking in analog’s nuance.

However digital is much cheaper. Recording an album with analog technology can require a whole studio full of equipment, but with digital recording technology, it’s possible to record a whole album in a bedroom on a laptop. And whereas analog technology can wear out or be damaged, digital media can last for an indefinite length of time.

Today many recording artists, both major and independent, record using a mixture of digital and analog techniques. While analog audio does give warmth and a truer sound quality, digital is cheaper to work with and offers more control over the finished product.

4 0
3 years ago
How does the orbital velocity of the earth compare to the of mercury?
zalisa [80]

After my ythorough researching, the orbital velocity of the Earth compare to the Mercury is relative to each other. In addition, Mercury orbits the Sun and it is within the Earth's orbit as its lesser or inferior. The correct answer to the following given statement above is relative to each other.

 

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A force of 38.7 N is applied to the master cylinder of a hydraulic brake system. The cylinder has an area of 7.61 cm^2. The forc
    7·1 answer
  • How can the achievement of lifting a rocket off the ground and into space be explained
    14·1 answer
  • Two bowling balls are rolling toward each other. One of the balls, ball A, is 12 kg traveling to the right at a velocity of 3 m/
    7·1 answer
  • Why was Bohr’s atomic model replaced by the modern atomic model
    5·2 answers
  • Water that soaks into Earth may become _____ under the surface.
    8·2 answers
  • a baseball is travelling (+30 m/s) and is hit by a bat. it leaves the ball travelling (-40 m/s) what is the change in velocity
    13·1 answer
  • an unknown substance were tasted.the result are l.it conducts electricity when dissolved in water ll.it has high boiling point l
    12·1 answer
  • The net force acting on an object that is in equilibrium is...?
    5·1 answer
  • Which word best completes the sentence?
    12·2 answers
  • In this model, the velocity of the spacecraft at position 2 is the velocity of the craft at position 4. at position 1, the direc
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!