if the ph is above 7 then its acidic
if its below 7 than its going to be basic.
~serenity bella
2C4H10 + 13O2 = 8CO2 + 10H2O
1. (2.06g C4H10)/(58.12 g/mol C4H10) = 0.035mol C4H10
2. (0.035molC4H10)(10 mol H2O/2mol C4H10) = 0.177mol H2O
3. (0.177mol H2O)(18.01g/mol H2O) = 3.19g H2O
Answer:
![Kp=3.07x10^6](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Kp%3D3.07x10%5E6)
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, by knowing the given reference reactions, one could rearrange them as follows:
![2 NO(g) \leftrightarrow N_2(g) + O_2(g); Kp_2 = \frac{1}{2.3 x 10^{-19}}=4.35x10^{18}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2%20NO%28g%29%20%5Cleftrightarrow%20N_2%28g%29%20%2B%20O_2%28g%29%3B%20Kp_2%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2.3%20x%2010%5E%7B-19%7D%7D%3D4.35x10%5E%7B18%7D)
![N_2(g) + 2O_2(g) \leftrightarrow 2NO_2(g);Kp_3=(8.4x10^{-7})^2=7.056x10^{-13}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=N_2%28g%29%20%2B%202O_2%28g%29%20%5Cleftrightarrow%202NO_2%28g%29%3BKp_3%3D%288.4x10%5E%7B-7%7D%29%5E2%3D7.056x10%5E%7B-13%7D)
Subsequently, to obtain the main reaction, we add the aforementioned reference rearranged reactions as shown below (just as reference):
![2NO(g)+N_2(g)+2O_2\leftrightarrow 2NO_2(g)+N_2+O_2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=2NO%28g%29%2BN_2%28g%29%2B2O_2%5Cleftrightarrow%202NO_2%28g%29%2BN_2%2BO_2)
Consequently, the equilibrium constant is computed as:
![Kp=\frac{[N_2][O_2]}{[NO]^2} * \frac{[NO_2]^2}{[N_2][O_2]^2} =Kp_2*Kp_3=4.35x10^{18}*7.056x10^{-13}=3.07x10^6](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Kp%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BN_2%5D%5BO_2%5D%7D%7B%5BNO%5D%5E2%7D%20%2A%20%5Cfrac%7B%5BNO_2%5D%5E2%7D%7B%5BN_2%5D%5BO_2%5D%5E2%7D%20%3DKp_2%2AKp_3%3D4.35x10%5E%7B18%7D%2A7.056x10%5E%7B-13%7D%3D3.07x10%5E6)
Best regards.
<span>Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientific journal. Several months later, they received the paper back from the publisher with many comments attached from several fellow scientists. It is either that they revise their study or replicate the study. Most scientists would revisit their work and the findings they had from their research. Most probable if they were successful and the comments of the publisher and the co-scientists were positive they could replicate the study to validate its accountability.<span>
</span></span>