Chaff has also written about his book of Mormon that is not true to say this but it doesn't have the
Answer:
The reason is because both are exposed to a virtually infinite heat sink, due to the virtually infinite mass and of the surrounding environment, compared to the sizes of either the cup or the kettle such that the equilibrium temperature,
reached is the same for both the cup and the kettle as given by the relation;
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c972/4c972b340c5247e6f5b126f96870346cec2eda63" alt="\infty M_{(environ)} \times c_{(environ)} \times (T_2 - T_1) = m_{1} \times c_{(water)} \times (T_3 - T_2) + m_{2} \times c_{(water)} \times (T_4 - T_2)"
Due to the large heat sink, T₂ - T₁ ≈ 0 such that the temperature of the kettle and that of the cup will both cool to the temperature of the environment
Explanation:
Answer:
The depth is 5.15 m.
Explanation:
Lets take the depth of the pool = h m
The atmospheric pressure ,P = 101235 N/m²
The area of the top = A m²
The area of the bottom = a m²
Given that A= 1.5 a
The force on the top of the pool = P A
The total pressure on the bottom = P + ρ g h
ρ =Density of the water = 1000 kg/m³
The total pressure at the bottom of the pool = (P + ρ g h) a
The bottom and the top force is same
(P + ρ g h) a = P A
P a +ρ g h a = P A
ρ g h a = P A - P a
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/336fc/336fc06ff3f40bdc78c982f38cfe0088723f6b36" alt="h=\dfrac{P ( A-a)}{\rho g a}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/233fa/233fa4c68b00e3783299b45b2fad340808df9ef4" alt="h=\dfrac{P ( 1.5 a-a)}{\rho g a}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/220b2/220b2d07a9827e448b8bce49e816188f096e5a56" alt="h=\dfrac{P ( 1.5- 1)}{\rho g}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90e54/90e54943b52003a964b996fe56c4ab73ce3342ea" alt="h=\dfrac{101235 ( 1.5- 1)}{1000\times 9.81}\ m"
h=5.15 m
The depth is 5.15 m.
I’m sorry I don’t understand this language
Answer:
a) {[1.25 1.5 1.75 2.5 2.75]
[35 30 25 20 15] }
b) {[1.5 2 40]
[1.75 3 35]
[2.25 2 25]
[2.75 4 15]}
Explanation:
Matrix H: {[1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75]
[1 2 3 1 2 3 4]
[45 40 35 30 25 20 15]}
Its always important to get the dimensions of your matrix right. "Roman Columns" is the mental heuristic I use since a matrix is defined by its rows first and then its column such that a 2 X 5 matrix has 2 rows and 5 columns.
Next, it helps in the beginning to think of a matrix as a grid, labeling your rows with letters (A, B, C, ...) and your columns with numbers (1, 2, 3, ...).
For question a, we just want to take the elements A1, A2, A3, A6 and A7 from matrix H and make that the first row of matrix G. And then we will take the elements B3, B4, B5, B6 and B7 from matrix H as our second row in matrix G.
For question b, we will be taking columns from matrix H and making them rows in our matrix K. The second column of H looks like this:
{[1.5]
[2]
[40]}
Transposing this column will make our first row of K look like this:
{[1.5 2 40]}
Repeating for columns 3, 5 and 7 will give us the final matrix K as seen above.