Answer: High supportive, low directive
Explanation: High supportive , low directive is the leadership method in which the supporting act is main focus and low instructional approach is present. The leader of this method provide help in solving issue by support and let the followers make their decision.
The situation mentioned in question describes that Maria is using high supportive and low directive techniques.She provides the followers the daily decision control and still try to help them in their activities by providing them assistance and support.She does not strictly instructs the followers.
A date which will live in infamy—the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.
Answer:
Residents of Washington D.C. are banned from voting for president. True
The first description of the DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid)chain was done by Watson and Crick in 1953, the nucleotides that constitute the DNA are four: cytosine (C), guanine (G), timine (T) and adenine (A). When doing a model is essential to remember that cytosine ONLY joins guanine and timine only link adenine, this is due to the size and chemical properties of each molecule. Later, another related and similar and molecule was discovered, the ribonucleic acid or RNA, which also is constructed by nucleotides.
In both cases, the nucleotides are compound of 3 main components: a nitrogen base, a pentose and a phosphate. When the molecule lacks the phosphate group, is called nucleoside. Depending on the chain ( DNA or RNA) the nitrogen base derives from purine (adenine and guanine) or pyrimidine (cytosine or timine) just in the RNA instead of timine is uracil (U)
The union is established between adjacent molecules through the phosphate, while among each other through the nitrogen base-remember C=G and T or U=A. The core of each molecule is the pentose. Therefore the best representation of the molecule is attached
References
Watson, J. D., & Crick, F. H. (1953, January). The structure of DNA. In Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology (Vol. 18, pp. 123-131). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Answer:
I would say that robots should not take the place of animals because some robots can malfunction and some thing can happen like exsplod or even worse but animals should not be replaced because that could make an person lazy like if the robot doesn't have to use the rest room or some thing then the human would not like getting out to extra size with the real dog and just stay in the house all day.
Explanation:
hey i hop this helped make sure to change up my words a little when you write it down so it doesn't look like copy write ok