Here are the answers in order:
1. During a physical change the substance changes physically.
2. The law of conservation of mass is a law stating the conservation of mass cannot be higher than 46mg or lower than 32mg.
3. A hypothesis is a guess that you make before completing a science experiment, it can be considered a law because it is important to know why you are making the guess.
4. During a chemical change the mass is changing colors. This is a representation of a chemical change.
5. Oil is a non-renewable resource, so it cannot demonstrate the conservation of mass.
6. When the color of the substance has changed or when it explodes.
7. Reactants are the objects that react when in a chemical change.
8. If you follow the rule of not going higher than 46mg and not lower than 32mg then it will automatically follow this law.
Chemical Reactions Part One Video:
1. mass
2. erupt-ant
3. reactant
4. object
5. mixtures
6. molecules
7. color changed
Questions again:
1. A chemical reaction
2. A physical change
3. Because if it is no higher than 46mg and no lower than 32mg then it will follow on it's own.
When looking down the groups the elements have an equal number of electrons in the outer shell. This means they react in a similar way making it easier for scientists to use.
The empirical formula of this compound is 
<h3>Empirical formula </h3>
To calculate the empirical formula of a compound, the value of moles of each element is needed.
As we have the information of the mass value, we will use the molar mass expression, which corresponds to:
As the value of the empirical formula must be an integer, simply multiply the two values by a common factor:
So, the empirical formula of this compound is .
Learn more about empirical formula: brainly.com/question/1247523
Answer:
11.33
Explanation:
-log(2.3x10^-3) = 2.67
14-2.67
- Hope this helped! Let me know if you need a further explanation.
Deductive reasoning involves making broad observations and examining possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion, which is required in the formation of a hypothesis. Conversely, inductive reasoning involves taking specific observations and making broad generalisations from these. Therefore the answer is A.
Hope this helps!
