Evolution can not be tested by experiment given that it depends largely on observations that fit into a wider scope and point to a common conclusion.
<h3>Can evolution be proven empirically?</h3>
Science is know to be empirical, In science, the evidence that backs up a claim is what establishes it as true or false. Thus all theories must be tested by experiment.
However, the theory of evolution can not be tested by experiment given that it depends largely on observations that fit into a wider scope and point to a common conclusion. In other words, evolution lies “outside of empirical science”.
The fact that it can not be directly proven empirically does not necessarily make it out to be false. That was the conclusion of Paul Ehrlich in his 1967 article.
Learn more about evolution:brainly.com/question/13492988
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
Hello there!
In this case, for this units conversion problem, it turns out necessary to write the equivalence statement for liters and quarts as follows:
1 qt = 0.946353 L
Thus, the conversion set up turns out to be:
Next, we convert to microliters as follows:
Regards!
Answer:
0.643 mol.
Explanation:
- We can use the general law of ideal gas: <em>PV = nRT.</em>
where, P is the pressure of the gas in atm (P = 4.0 atm).
V is the volume of the gas in L (V = 4000 mL = 4.0 L).
n is the no. of moles of the gas in mol (n = ??? mol).
R is the general gas constant (R = 0.0821 L.atm/mol.K),
T is the temperature of the gas in K (T = 30ºC + 273 = 303 K).
<em>∴ n = PV/RT </em>= (4.0 atm)(4.0 L)/(0.0821 L.atm/mol.K)(303 K) = <em>0.643 mol.</em>
There's a heck ton of snow! What does that mean? It means metals that may not be water-soluble can rust. <span />