1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NeTakaya
3 years ago
6

Tulle

Chemistry
1 answer:
Andre45 [30]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

RH = 20%

Explanation:

Data given:

water pressure at 0°C  = 4.85 g/m³

Actual water vapor density = 0.97 g/m³

Relative humidity (RH) = ?

Solution:

Formula used

       Relative humidity (RH) =  \frac{actual vapor density}{saturated vapor density of water}  x 100%

As we know that at 0°C water vapor have 4.85 g/m³ saturated vapor density.

So,

put values in the above formula

     Relative humidity (RH) =  0.97 g/m³ /  4.85 g/m³ x 100%

     Relative humidity (RH) =  0.2 x 100%

     Relative humidity (RH) = 20%

So,  

Relative humidity (RH) = 20%

You might be interested in
True or false. Gas particles never touch each other. A. True; gas particles move too rapidly to ever touch. B. False; gas partic
vodomira [7]

C) gas particles move rapidly but they collide with each other as well as on the wall of the container

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Two gas cylinders have identical volumes and contain gases at identical temperatures and pressures. Cylinder A contains hydrogen
liraira [26]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What are the steps followed in corroding iron​
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer: Electrochemical oxidation of metal in reaction with an oxidant such as oxygen or sulfates is the step of corroding iron...(sorry if it is wrong)

4 0
3 years ago
What is the total ionic equation for the following
Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is most likely to make scientific knowledge stronger?
Mariulka [41]

Answer:

D) Evaluating it with experimentation and argument.

Explanation:

If you don't have enough observational evidence, then you can't really strengthen your scientific knowledge, because you haven't collected enough information to answer the questions you're asking.

If you only have a few scientists working on a question, it will take longer to find an answer. With more people working on a concept, it can be solved in more time.

It can be good to create new hypotheses, but only if you've already tested your original hypothesis (with experimentation and argument), and it turned out to be wrong. Once you've rejected your first hypothesis, only then should you make a new one.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In Period 3, from left to right in order, each successive
    9·2 answers
  • Type in he correct values to correctly represent the valence electron configuration of oxygen
    6·1 answer
  • 1. A balloon with a fixed amount of air is at room temperature. The balloon is placed in a pan of hot water. • Describe what hap
    7·2 answers
  • 1. The two qualities used to describe winds are________ and speed. 2. a local wing that blows during the day from an ocean towar
    14·1 answer
  • Balance the following equation: Ag+O_(2) > Ag_(2)O
    9·2 answers
  • Matty told Harriet that, later that same day, he was going to try to convince her to change her attitude toward the nutritional
    11·1 answer
  • ANSWER ASAP GIVING BRAINLIEST FIVE STARS AND HEART!
    7·1 answer
  • ¿Qué estudia la química orgánica?
    7·1 answer
  • Describing Chemical Reactions
    8·1 answer
  • Does nitrogen triiodide dipole?.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!