Which of the following is NOT an example of covalent bonding? * 2 points H20 NaF NH3 O2

What is the approximate bond angle around the central carbon atom in acrolein?

Soloha48 [4]

Answer:

The approximate bond angle around the central carbon atom in acrolein is 120°.

Explanation:

The structure of acrolein is shown in the attachment. From the structure, we can deduce that the central carbon atom is in an sp2 hybridization (Atoms with a double bond hybridize in an sp2 fashion).

Atoms with sp2 hybridization have trigonal planar geometry, in this kind of hybridization, bonds are oriented the farthest away possible from each other, to minimize overlapping and the angle that allows that is 120°.

7 0

3 years ago

Complete and balance the chemical equations for the precipitation reactions, if any, between the following pairs of reactants, a

Crank

Explanation:

a. $Pb(NO_3)_2(aq) + Na_2SO_4(aq)$ → ?

$Pb(NO_3)_2(aq) + Na_2SO_4(aq)\rightarrow PbSO_4(s)+2NaNO_3(aq)$

$Pb(NO_3)_2(aq)\rightarrow Pb^{2+}(aq)+2NO_3^{-}(aq)$

$Na_2SO_4(aq)\rightarrow 2Na^++SO_4^{2-}(aq)$

$Pb^{2+}(aq)+2NO_3^{-}(aq)+2Na^++SO_4^{2-}(aq)\rightarrow PbSO_4(s)+2Na^++2NO_3^{-}(aq)$

Removing common ions from both sides, we get the net ionic equation:

$Pb^{2+}(aq)+SO_4^{2-}(aq)\rightarrow PbSO_4(s)$

b. $NiCl_2(aq) + NH_4NO_3(aq)$ →

$NiCl_2(aq) + NH4NO_3(aq) \rightarrow Ni(NO_3)_2+NH_4Cl(aq)$

No precipitation is occuring.

c. $Fe_Cl2(aq) + Na_2S(aq)$ →

$FeCl_2(aq) + Na_2S(aq)\rightarrow FeS(s)+2NaCl(aq)$

$FeCl_2(aq)\rightarrow Fe^{2+}(aq)+2Cl^{-}(aq)$

$Na_2S(aq)\rightarrow 2Na^++S{2-}(aq)$

$Fe^{2+}(aq)+2Cl^{-}(aq)+2Na^++S^{2-}(aq)\rightarrow FeS(s)+2Na^++2Cl^{-}(aq)$

Removing common ions from both sides, we get the net ionic equation:

$Fe^{2+}(aq)+S^{2-}(aq)\rightarrow FeS(s)$

d. $MgSO_4(aq) + BaCl_2(aq)$ →

$MgSO4(aq) + BaCl2(aq)\rightarrow BaSO_4(s)+MgCl_2$

$MgSO_4(aq)\rightarrow Mg^{2+}(aq)+SO_4^{2-}(aq)$

$BaCl_2(aq)\rightarrow Ba^{2+}+2Cl^{-}(aq)$

$Mg^{2+}(aq)+SO_4^{2-}(aq)+Ba^{2+}+2Cl^{-}(aq)(aq)\rightarrow BaSO_4(s)+Mg^{2+}(aq)+2Cl^{-}(aq)$

Removing common ions from both sides, we get the net ionic equation:

$Ba^{2+}(aq)+SO_4^{2-}(aq)\rightarrow BaSO_4(s)$

5 0

3 years ago

What is true about an element

stich3 [128]

Answer:

made from ine atom

Explanation:

one atom

5 0

2 years ago

PLS ASAP!! Which has a wavelength of 350 nanometers?

slava [35]

Answer:

Ultraviolet light.

Hope this helps!

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

State which of the following set of quantum number would be possible and which would be permissible for an electron in an atom.

raketka [301]

Answer:

The correct option is: e) n=4, l=3, $m_{l}$ = - 2 , $m_{s}$ = - 1/2

Explanation:

The four quantum numbers that describe the electrons in an atom are: The principal: n, azimuthal: l, magnetic: m, and spin: s.

For a given electron, the values of the quantum numbers should be in the given range- principal quantum number: n ≥ 1;

azimuthal quantum number: 0 ≤ l ≤ n − 1;

magnetic quantum number: −l ≤ $m_{l}$ ≤ +l;

spin quantum number: −s ≤ $m_{s}$ ≤ +s

Now, for n= 4,

The value of l: 0 to n − 1 = 0 to 3 = 0, 1, 2, 3

The value of $m_{l}$ for l= 3 : -3 to +3 = -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3

The value of $m_{s}$ : -1/2, +1/2

Therefore, the given set of quantum numbers: n=4, l=3, $m_{l}$ = - 2 , $m_{s}$ = - 1/2; are possible and permissible for an electron in an atom.

5 0

3 years ago