Answer:
-2.26×10^-4 radians
Explanation:
The solution involves a right angle triangle
Length is z while the horizontal is the height x
X^2+ 100^2=z^2
Taking the derivatives
2x(dx/dt)=Z^2(dz/dt)
Specific moments = Z= 200 ,X= 100sqrt3 and dx/dt= 11
dz/dt= 1100sqrt3/200 = 9.53
Sin a= 100/a
Taking derivatives in terms of t
Cos a(da/dt)=100/z^2 dz/dt
a= 30°
Cos (30°)da/dt= (-100/40000×9.5)
a= -2.26×10^-4radians
Answer:
0.000234 seconds
Explanation:
Since the row is 0.15m, its radius of rotation must be 0.15 / 2 = 0.075 m
We can start by calculating the angular speed of the rod:
Since one revolution equals to 2π rad. The speed in revolution per second must be
26800 / 2π = 4265 revolution/s
The number of seconds per revolution, or period, is the inverse:
1/4265 = 0.000234 seconds
Explanation:
R = V/I
Since this is an I/V graph, the greater the slope of the line the lower the R value.
Hence we find the line with the smallest slope, which is conductor M.
The velocity of the trainee is 29 m/s or 0.42 rev/s
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
Acceleration is rate of change of velocity.
<em>a = acceleration (m / s²)v = final velocity (m / s)</em>
<em>u = initial velocity (m / s)</em>
<em>t = time taken (s)</em>
<em>d = distance (m)</em>
Centripetal Acceleration of circular motion could be calculated using following formula:
<em>a = centripetal acceleration ( m/s² )</em>
<em>v = velocity ( m/s )</em>
<em>R = radius of circle ( m )</em>
Let us now tackle the problem!
<u>Given:</u>
Radius of horizontal circle = R = 11.0 m
Force Felt by the Trainee = F = 7.80w
<u>Unknown:</u>
Velocity of Rotation = v = ?
<u>Solution:</u>
→ in rad/s
→ in rev/s
<h3>Learn more</h3>
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: High School
Subject: Physics
Chapter: Circular Motion
Keywords: Velocity , Driver , Car , Deceleration , Acceleration , Obstacle , Speed , Time , Rate , Circular , Ball , Centripetal
Because they are not supported by the results of any legitimate investigation
that's conducted in accordance with the Scientific Method.
You may say:
"Well then, teach both lines of reasoning,
and let each student decide for himself."
This is suggested by the same people who aren't ready to let their
fourth-grader choose his own clothing, dinner menu, or school.
And it sounds reasonable to a vast mass of citizens who have decided
for them selves that the jury is still out on climate change.
What I'm saying is this:
-- The Scientific Method is a METHOD of investigation that's designed
and developed to remove the effects of human prejudice from the
collection and evaluation of evidence, and to be able to tell bogus
conclusions apart from true ones. It's the most reliable way we have
of asking and answering questions about the natural world.
-- Some questions CAN'T be studied with the Scientific Method,
because experiments generally can't be constructed. These include
matters of religion and faith. Nobody can flatly state that those are
right or wrong. We have no reliable way to say, either way.
The only way to decide is . . . faith.
-- It is illegitimate to take the answer to a question of faith that can't be
derived scientifically, and a scientifically derived conclusion, set them
down next to each other on the same table, and pretend that they can be
compared.
-- When you put them next to each other, say that they're equivalent,
and tell people "go ahead and choose one or the other", the situation
is bogus, the comparison is dishonest, and people who are untrained
or uneducated or immature are not qualified to "choose".
That's why.
This is my opinion. I could be wrong.
Personally, I happen to be a believer. But I cannot prove anything I believe
to anyone else ... not with rational argument, and not with evidence. Those are
elements of the scientific method. They're not applicable, and they don't work,
in matters of faith.
