Answer:
c) illogical thinking.
Explanation:
Illogical thinking: The term illogical thinking is defined as the specific use of logical things or bugs in leading rationalization exercise.
In an illogical thinking, an individual or client is asked to demonstrate a particular behavior whether his or behavior or someone else's behavior. If the client's reasoning is intelligible and rational overall, then a small logical bug sticks together as a sore thumb.
In the question above, the cognitive theorists would say that her depression results in large part from illogical thinking.
The first three options I see are all making-decision process to take action, but the last one is the one that is not like that. Researching is something that is not so close in meaning to what you need. That is why, D is a good option.
Huntington's disease (HD) is a revolutionary mind sickness caused by a faulty gene. This sickness reasons changes within the relevant location of the brain, which affect motion, temper, and thinking abilities.
Huntington's ailment (HD) is a deadly genetic disorder that reasons the progressive breakdown of nerve cells inside the brain. It deteriorates a person's bodily and mental skills usually throughout their top running years and has no cure.
Huntington's disorder is because of a mutation inside the gene for a protein referred to as huntingtin. The illness reasons the cytosine, adenine, and guanine (CAG) building blocks of DNA to repeat many greater instances than is normal. every child of a discern with HD has a 50-50 danger of inheriting the HD gene.
Learn more about Huntington's disorder here:
brainly.com/question/12572808
#SPJ4
The answer is C. Electors were decided by the popular vote of citizens
Explanation: Thoreau was a philosopher, writer and devotee of nature. His philosophy was based on independence, freedom of mind. He felt that the government was restricting people from taking care of themselves, their needs. He was not an anarchist but believed in minimal, almost no governmental restrictions.
He considered the rule of the majority is not good, because it implied the compulsion of having to go with the group and follow the rules of the group, which was restrictive for him. The only obligation, according to Thoreau, was to follow his conscience. That way, he would only do what he thought was right, and he would be obliged to do only what was right.
