If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
Answer:
Understanding the Federal Hiring Process | U.S. Department of Labor.
Answer:
Hidden Valley's Asset Turnover = 1.6
Explanation:
Average Total Asset = (Total Assets at the beginning of the year + Total Assets at the end of the year)/2
Average Total Asset = (450,000+550,000)/2
Average Total Asset = 1,000,0000/2 = 500,000
Asset Turnover = Net Sales / Average Total Asset
Asset Turnover = 800,000/500,000
Asset Turnover = 8/5
Asset Turnover = 1.6
B. Onion, celery, and bell pepper!
Paquette purchased
federalism
a building and land and immediately tore down the building
Reconstruction
.
Reconstruction
failed by most other measures: Radical Republican legislation ultimately failed to protect former slaves from white persecution and failed to engender fundamental changes to the social fabric of the South. When President Rutherford B.
federalism
debate that had been an issue since the 1790s almost mediately . Hayes removed federal troops from the South in 1877, former Confederate officials and slave returned to With the support of a conservative Supreme Court, these newly empowered white southern politicians passed black codes, voter qualifications, and other anti-progressive legislation to reverse the rights that blacks had gained during Radical Reconstruction. The U.S. Supreme Court bolstered this anti-progressive movement federalism with decisions in the Slaughterhouse Cases, the Civil Rights Cases, and United States v.
Learn more about
Reconstruction
on:
brainly.com/question/24761999
#SPJ4
