Checking account fit the description above. Checking account gives the owner unrestricted access to his account but have no or low interest rate.<span />
Answer:
Option d is the right one.
Explanation:
- Marginal research or analysis to optimize future gains as a decision-making method. In comparison to the expenses incurred by this same behavior, it calculates added benefits. The illustration described demonstrates that the marginal gain is smaller than that of the marginal cost.
- This involves purchasing goods until the marginal gain is equal to the marginal cost.
The other options aren't sufficient for the scenario provided. But that will be the best alternative for option d.
Answer:
846,000 shares
Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follows:
Outstanding common stock = 807,000 shares
Outstanding option stock = 150,000
option price = $37
Market price of common stock = $50
So, 150,000 - (150,000 × $37 ÷ 50)
= 150,000 - 111,000
= 39,000
So, Number of shares = 807,000 + 39,000
= 846,000 shares
Answer:
Explanation:
Solution-
According to Senator Jones, the elasticity of taxable income is larger, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a greater percentage. Also, according to Senator Smith, the elasticity of taxable income is small, which means that due to a certain percentage rise in taxes, the taxable income rises by a smaller percentage.
(I) Under Senator Jones assumptions, due to rise in taxes, the taxable income has risen considerably as compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the estimates of additional revenue from the tax increase will be larger under Senator Jones assumptions, compared to Smith's assumptions.
(ii) Since under Senator Jones assumptions, elasticity of taxable income is large. So due to rise in taxes, there is a significant proportional rise in taxable income under Jone's assumptions compared to Senator Smith assumptions. Thus the costs of the tax increase is borne more under Senator Jones assumptions , compared to Smith's assumptions.
Answer:
Depreciation and amortization is $7.5 million
Explanation:
If the tax rate is 40%, then the net income is 60%
tax expense=net income*tax rate/60%=$5.4 million/60%*40%=$3.6 million
Depreciation and amortization=EBITDA-tax-interest-net income
EBITDA is $22.5 million
interest is $6 million
net income is $5.4 million
Depreciation and amortization=$22.5 milion-$6 million-$3.6 million-$5.4 million
Depreciation and amortization=$7.5 million