1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anzhelika [568]
3 years ago
10

A three-step process for producing molten iron metal from Fe2O3 is: 3Fe2O3 + CO → 2Fe3O4 + CO2 Fe3O4 + CO → 3FeO + CO2 FeO + CO

→ Fe + CO2 Assuming that the reactant CO is present in excess and that the yields, respectively, for the three steps are 84.6%, 50.8% and 85.7%, what mass of iron metal would be produced from 390. kg of Fe2O3?
Chemistry
1 answer:
miskamm [114]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

There is 100.4652 kg of iron produced from 390 kg of Fe2O3

Explanation:

<u>Step 1</u>: Given data

3Fe2O3 + CO → 2Fe3O4 + CO2

Fe3O4 + CO → 3FeO + CO2

FeO + CO → Fe + CO2

Mass of Fe2O3 = 390 kg = 390000 grams

Molar mass of Fe2O3 = 159.69 g/moles

<u>Step 2: </u>Calculate moles of Fe2O3

Moles of Fe2O3 = mass of Fe2O3 / Molar mass of Fe2O3

Moles of Fe2O3 = 390000 grams / 159.69 g/moles = 2442.2 moles

<u>Step 3</u>: Calculate expected moles of Fe3O4

In the first equation, for 3 moles of Fe2O3 consumed ,we get 2 moles of Fe3O4. The mole ratio is 3:2

This means if we consume 2442.2 moles of Fe2O3, there will be produced 2/3 * 2442.2 = 1628.2 moles of Fe3O4

Since the yield for the step is only 84.6 %

This will be 0.846 * 1628.2 = 1377.4 moles of Fe3O4

<u>Step 4:</u> Calculate expected moles of FeO

In the second equation, for 1 mole of Fe3O4 consumed, there is produced 3 moles of FeO

This means for 1377.4 moles of Fe3O4 consumed, there is 3*1377.4 = 4132.2 moles of FeO produced

Since the yield for the step is only 50.8%

This will be 0.508 * 4132.2 = 2099.2 moles of FeO

<u>Step 5:</u> Calculate expected moles of Fe

In the third equation, for 1 mole of FeO consumed, there is produced 1 mole of Fe.

This means for 2099.2 moles of FeO consumed, there is also 2099.2 moles of Fe produced

Since the yield is only 85.7%

This will be 0.857 * 2099.2 = 1799 moles of Fe

<u>Step 6:</u> Calculate mass of Fe

Mass of Fe = moles of Fe * Molar mass of Fe

Mass of Fe = 1799 moles of Fe * 55.845 g/moles = 100465.2 grams = 100.4652 kg of Fe

There is 100.4652 kg of iron produced from 390 kg of Fe2O3

You might be interested in
What does it mean to say that science is a “systematic” process?
adoni [48]

Answer: Science is a precise interaction, which implies it follows a cautious technique that includes perception and experimentation. Through experimentation, data is gathered that upholds or disproves a researcher's theory. ... Science is upheld by realities and cycles.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When a sample is heated water is observed at the top of the tube. The compound melts and changes color. Te residue is not entire
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

hydrate

Explanation:

when a hydrate is heated,it changes color due to the exothermic reaction taking place.the structure of the complex changes but not entirely.this result in the sample to to not dissolve completely and we can observe the small traces of the sample.

7 0
3 years ago
If electromagnetic radiation has a frequency of 2.0×1015s−1, what is the radiation’s energy?(1 point)
Alika [10]
  • Frequency=v=2×10^15Hz
  • Energy=E

Using planks quantum theory

\\ \sf\longmapsto E=hv

\\ \sf\longmapsto E=6.626\times 10^{-34}Js\times 2\times 10^{15}s^{-1}

\\ \sf\longmapsto E=13.252\times 10^{-19}J

\\ \sf\longmapsto E=1.3\times 10^{-18}J

7 0
3 years ago
Scientists saw how well people responded to animals and imagined ___________ that these interactions might be helpful in some ty
sukhopar [10]

For most of the last 50 years, technology knew its place. We all spent a lot of time with technology—we drove to work, flew on airplanes, used telephones and computers, and cooked with microwaves. But even five years ago, technology seemed external, a servant. These days, what’s so striking is not only technology’s ubiquity but also its intimacy.

On the Internet, people create imaginary identities in virtual worlds and spend hours playing out parallel lives. Children bond with artificial pets that ask for their care and affection. A new generation contemplates a life of wearable computing, finding it natural to think of their eyeglasses as screen monitors, their bodies as elements of cyborg selves. Filmmakers reflect our anxieties about these developments, present and imminent. In Wim Wenders’s Until the End of the World, human beings become addicted to a technology that shows video images of their dreams. In The Matrix, the Wachowski brothers paint a future in which people are plugged into a virtual reality game. In Steven Spielberg’s AI: Artificial Intelligence, a woman struggles with her feelings for David, a robot child who has been programmed to love her.

Today, we are not yet faced with humanoid robots that demand our affection or with parallel universes as developed as the Matrix. Yet we’re increasingly preoccupied with the virtual realities we now experience. People in chat rooms blur the boundaries between their on-line and off-line lives, and there is every indication that the future will include robots that seem to express feelings and moods. What will it mean to people when their primary daily companion is a robotic dog? Or to a hospital patient when her health care attendant is built in the form of a robot nurse? Both as consumers and as businesspeople, we need to take a closer look at the psychological effects of the technologies we’re using today and of the innovations just around the corner.

Indeed, the smartest people in the field of technology are already doing just that. MIT and Cal Tech, providers of much of the intellectual capital for today’s high-tech business, have been turning to research that examines what technology does to us as well as what it does for us. To probe these questions further, HBR senior editor Diane L. Coutu met with Sherry Turkle, the Abby Rockefeller Mauzé Professor in the Program in Science, Technology, and Society at MIT. Turkle is widely considered one of the most distinguished scholars in the area of how technology influences human identity.

Few people are as well qualified as Turkle to understand what happens when mind meets machine. Trained as a sociologist and psychologist, she has spent more than 20 years closely observing how people interact with and relate to computers and other high-tech products. The author of two groundbreaking books on people’s relationship to computers—The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit and Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet—Turkle is currently working on the third book, with the working title Intimate Machines, in what she calls her “computational trilogy.” At her home in Boston, she spoke with Coutu about the psychological dynamics between people and technology in an age when technology is increasingly redefining what it means to be human.

You’re at the frontier of research being done on computers and their effects on society. What has changed in the past few decades?

To be in computing in 1980, you had to be a computer scientist. But if you’re an architect now, you’re in computing. Physicians are in computing. Businesspeople are certainly in computing. In a way, we’re all in computing; that’s just inevitable. And this means that the power of the computer—with its gifts of simulation and visualization—to change our habits of thought extends across the culture.



5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The best electrolyte solutions are A. dilute B. concentrated C. saturated
Rudiy27
The correct answer is A.) dilute
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • why are the theoretical density values of brass, bronze, and steel reported as a range of densities? how can you categorize thes
    9·1 answer
  • Name the following organic compounds.
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best example of a hypothesis?
    12·1 answer
  • In the space, show a correct numerical setup for calculating the number of moles of CO2 present in 11 grams of CO2
    11·1 answer
  • Calcium Oxide is used to remove pollutant SO2 from smokestack gases. The ΔG° of the overall reaction is -418.6 kJ. What is PSO2
    7·1 answer
  • When the partition is removed, the gas expands and fills both compartments. How many moles n of gas were initially contained in
    6·1 answer
  • What is the molar Mass of 2.4g of oxygen
    14·1 answer
  • Please help, will mark brainliest
    6·1 answer
  • Please help! I’ll mark brainliest for best answer!
    10·1 answer
  • You have 5.00 L of 6.0 M KNO3. What volume does the solution need to be diluted to
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!